IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v96y2026ics0927538x26000211.html

Fintech revolution in banking: A double-edged sword?

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Habib Hussain
  • Qureshi, Fiza
  • Ahmad, Mohammad Rais
  • Anwar, Ayesha

Abstract

We develop a novel bank-level index of fintech integration by mitigating media bias in index construction. We then explore its relationship with bank stability across 56 economies from 2010 to 2022. We uncover a U-shaped relationship between this index and bank stability. Initially, fintech increases bank fragility, but as integration deepens, it ultimately enhances stability. Interestingly, this pattern is influenced by both bank-level and industry-level factors. Strong, foreign-owned banks experience a milder initial decline in stability, reflecting their ability to navigate the fintech landscape effectively. Furthermore, banks operating in developed, competitive markets show a flatter relationship, emphasizing the importance of a supportive ecosystem. The role of regulatory sandboxes varies depending on factors such as bank competition, economic growth, regulatory strength, financial development, and access to credit information. We further validate our findings using an instrumental variables approach and an alternative index of fintech integration, reinforcing the robustness of the identified U-shaped relationship between fintech and bank stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Habib Hussain & Qureshi, Fiza & Ahmad, Mohammad Rais & Anwar, Ayesha, 2026. "Fintech revolution in banking: A double-edged sword?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:96:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26000211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X26000211
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:96:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26000211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.