IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v96y2026ics0927538x26000144.html

Conservatism and silence: The clan premium

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jier
  • Yin, Libo

Abstract

This paper investigates the asset pricing implications of clan culture, the root culture of China. We construct a long–short portfolio based on firms with high versus low clan strength and uncover a significant positive return spread. This clan premium remains robust after controlling for standard risk factors and firm characteristics, and is resilient to endogeneity and sensitivity checks. Further analysis suggests that such premium cannot be attributed to systematic risk, but is more consistent with a mispricing-based explanation rooted in behavioral preferences of clan-affiliated firms. Specifically, the persistent conservatism in corporate decisions conveys unjustifiably pessimistic signals to investors, leading to persistent undervaluation; clan-affiliated firms' limited disclosure incentives create an environment of informational opacity, impeding investors' timely recognition of positive information. In addition, we verify that clan-affiliated firms exhibit strong economic performance, thereby ruling out the possibility that the observed conservative behavior and low disclosure are driven by weak fundamentals.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jier & Yin, Libo, 2026. "Conservatism and silence: The clan premium," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:96:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26000144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X26000144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:96:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26000144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.