IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v93y2025ics0927538x25001982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collusive bidding: Evidence from China’s IPO bookbuilding mechanism reform

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Xiaping
  • Wang, Yintian
  • Wen, Yuxi

Abstract

This paper investigates the incentives behind investor collusion in China’s IPO market and assesses the effects of regulatory reforms on pricing efficiency. Our empirical evidence from registration-based IPOs in China between July 22, 2019 and December 31, 2022 highlights three key findings: first, before the bookbuilding mechanism reform, investors could coordinate to systematically depress offering prices below competitive levels; second, the reform, by granting underwriters greater discretion in pricing, reduced the expected payoff from collusive bidding to below that of competitive bidding, thereby substantially diminishing incentives to collude; third, as a result, the reform increased normalized offering prices by 0.885 units relative to underwriter benchmark prices and reduced first-day returns by 2.135 units. Overall, the findings highlight that enhancing underwriter discretion can be an effective policy tool to curb collusion and improve IPO pricing efficiency in emerging market.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Xiaping & Wang, Yintian & Wen, Yuxi, 2025. "Collusive bidding: Evidence from China’s IPO bookbuilding mechanism reform," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001982
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001982
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.