IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v93y2025ics0927538x25001635.html

Who knows more? The role of structural hole spanners in accurate information identification on social media

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Man
  • Long, Wen
  • Zhong, Yanqiang
  • Zhang, Wei

Abstract

Based on structural hole theory, this study explores the differences in the ability of Chinese social media users with different characteristics to provide accurate information. Using over 20 million interactive data from 2.19 million users, we construct a social network and identify structural hole spanners and ordinary users. As key players in a network, structural hole spanners are typically located at the intersections of different groups or information sources. They differ from ordinary users in the way they gather and disseminate information. The empirical results indicate that the accuracy of market judgements by structural hole spanners is at least 12.38 % higher than that of ordinary users. Strategy simulations show that using information from structural hole spanners to make investment decisions can achieve a 116 % cumulative return during the backtesting period, nearly four times that of ordinary users. This information advantage occurs primarily because opinion distance and information uniqueness play significant roles in improving information accuracy. This study not only helps deepen understanding of information dissemination characteristics among heterogeneous users on social media but also provides empirical support for the application of structural hole theory in finance, with important theoretical and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Man & Long, Wen & Zhong, Yanqiang & Zhang, Wei, 2025. "Who knows more? The role of structural hole spanners in accurate information identification on social media," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001635
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanzhao Zou & Dorien Herremans, 2022. "PreBit -- A multimodal model with Twitter FinBERT embeddings for extreme price movement prediction of Bitcoin," Papers 2206.00648, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    2. Wen, Jinyan & Qualls, William J. & Zeng, Deming, 2021. "To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Gu, Wentao & Yuan, Wenyu, 2024. "Research on the influence of chain shareholder network on enterprise green innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Cai, Yi & Tang, Zhenpeng & Chen, Ying, 2024. "Can real-time investor sentiment help predict the high-frequency stock returns? Evidence from a mixed-frequency-rolling decomposition forecasting method," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    6. Zhang, Yongjie & An, Yahui & Feng, Xu & Jin, Xi, 2017. "Celebrities and ordinaries in social networks: Who knows more information?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 153-161.
    7. Dragomirescu-Gaina, Catalin & Philippas, Dionisis & Goutte, Stéphane, 2023. "How to ‘Trump’ the energy market: Evidence from the WTI-Brent spread," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Yang, Jing & Xiong, Yan, 2024. "Social media sentiment contagion and stock price jumps and crashes," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Ton, Thai & Leung, Henry & Gao, Yang & Schiereck, Dirk, 2024. "Agreeing to disagree: Informativeness of sentiments in internet message boards," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    11. Jalili, Mahdi, 2013. "Social power and opinion formation in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(4), pages 959-966.
    12. Wang, Xinjie & Xiang, Zhiqiang & Xu, Weike & Yuan, Peixuan, 2022. "The causal relationship between social media sentiment and stock return: Experimental evidence from an online message forum," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Sun, Yiqun & Ji, Hao & Cai, Xiurong & Li, Jiangchen, 2023. "Joint extreme risk of energy prices-evidence from European energy markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Ante, Lennart, 2023. "How Elon Musk's Twitter activity moves cryptocurrency markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    15. Eierle, Brigitte & Klamer, Sebastian & Muck, Matthias, 2022. "Does it really pay off for investors to consider information from social media?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Hur, Wonchang & Oh, Junbyoung, 2021. "A man is known by the company he keeps?: A structural relationship between backward citation and forward citation of patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    17. Yuan, Kaibin & Liang, Yuheng & Zhu, Mengnan, 2024. "Social forecasting: Online social opinion and the cross-section of stock returns," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Krijkamp, Annefleur R. & Knoben, Joris & Oerlemans, Leon A.G. & Leenders, Roger T.A.J., 2021. "An ace in the hole: The effects of (in)accurately observed structural holes on organizational reputation positions in whole networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 703-713.
    19. Li, Tong & Chen, Hui & Liu, Wei & Yu, Guang & Yu, Yongtian, 2023. "Understanding the role of social media sentiment in identifying irrational herding behavior in the stock market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 163-179.
    20. Andrew Shipilov & Stan X. Li & Matthew S. Bothner & Nghi Truong, 2023. "Network advantage: Uncontested structural holes and organizational performance in market crises," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3122-3154, December.
    21. Rajiv Garg & Rahul Telang, 2018. "To Be or Not to Be Linked: Online Social Networks and Job Search by Unemployed Workforce," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3926-3941, August.
    22. Chen, Jason V., 2023. "The wisdom of crowds and the market's response to earnings news: Evidence using the geographic dispersion of investors," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    23. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2011. "When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 35-65, February.
    24. Sinan Aral & Paramveer S. Dhillon, 2023. "What (Exactly) Is Novelty in Networks? Unpacking the Vision Advantages of Brokers, Bridges, and Weak Ties," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1092-1115, February.
    25. Long, Wen & Zhong, Yanqiang, 2023. "The neglected cohort: The impact of silent majority in social media on stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    26. Yang, Xiaolan & Zhu, Yu & Cheng, Teng Yuan, 2020. "How the individual investors took on big data: The effect of panic from the internet stock message boards on stock price crash," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Frank Weikai & Sun, Chengzhu, 2022. "Information acquisition and expected returns: Evidence from EDGAR search traffic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Obaid, Khaled & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, 2022. "A picture is worth a thousand words: Measuring investor sentiment by combining machine learning and photos from news," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 273-297.
    3. Murad, S.M. Woahid & Pathan, Shams & Durand, Robert B. & Zheng, Chen, 2025. "Understanding Bank-Level Uncertainty: New insights into banking activity and its macroeconomic impacts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Shuyang You & Liwen Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Liangding Jia, 2025. "Structural holes and firm innovation in industrial clusters: A dual embeddedness perspective," Post-Print hal-05133753, HAL.
    5. Chong, Terence Tai Leung & Wu, Zhang & Liu, Yuchen, 2019. "Market Reaction to iPhone Rumors," MPRA Paper 92014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Allen Yikuan Huang & Zheqi Fan, 2026. "Beyond Prompting: An Autonomous Framework for Systematic Factor Investing via Agentic AI," Papers 2603.14288, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    7. Chris Florackis & Christodoulos Louca & Roni Michaely & Michael Weber, 2023. "Cybersecurity Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 351-407.
    8. Peng, Ya & Zhang, Xueyong, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty in OFDI host countries and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Du, Hanyu & Hao, Jing & He, Feng & Xi, Wenze, 2022. "Media sentiment and cross-sectional stock returns in the Chinese stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Abis, Simona & Lines, Anton, 2024. "Broken promises, competition, and capital allocation in the mutual fund industry," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Liu, Xiaoming & Shen, Xieyang & Wang, Changyun & Zeng, Jianyu, 2023. "Do fund managers' tones predict future performance? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Gregory, Richard Paul, 2021. "What determines Manager and Investor Sentiment?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    13. You, Shuyang & Wang, Liwen & Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Jia, Liangding, 2025. "Structural holes and firm innovation in industrial clusters: A dual embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Edeling, Alexander & Srinivasan, Shuba & Hanssens, Dominique M., 2021. "The marketing–finance interface: A new integrative review of metrics, methods, and findings and an agenda for future research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 857-876.
    15. Faccini, Renato & Matin, Rastin & Skiadopoulos, George, 2023. "Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Li, Ken, 2022. "Textual fundamentals in earnings press releases," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Guo, Chunying & Yang, Baochen & Fan, Ying, 2022. "Does mandatory CSR disclosure improve stock price informativeness? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Chen, Hailiang & Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun, 2022. "Listening in on investors’ thoughts and conversations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 426-444.
    19. Kim, Hee-Eun & Jo, Hoje & Ahn, Tae-Wook & Yi, Junesuh, 2022. "Corporate misconduct, media coverage, and stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Liu, Sha & Han, Jingguang, 2020. "Media tone and expected stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.