IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v92y2025ics0927538x25001556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does FinTech matter for rigidity and risk aversion among incumbent firms?

Author

Listed:
  • Gyan, Kwaku Alex
  • Galvin, Peter
  • Adjei-Bamfo, Peter

Abstract

Incumbent firms tend to seek less growth opportunities and are more risk-averse based on their core rigidities – premised on a behaviour of prioritising efficiency associated with improving existing processes. Recently, some firms have adopted FinTech to reduce core rigidity and advance their agility towards risk-taking. However, available research has not fully deconstructed FinTech's effect on the rigidity-risk relationship. We examine this observation among incumbent traditional financial services firms in Australia using both logit regression and fixed effect ordinary least squares. Our findings indicate that FinTech's impact on rigidity could be directional and counterproductive. While predictive FinTech (i.e., algorithmic routines in bigdata finance) facilitates a reduction of rigidity and increases risk-taking propensity but reduces bankruptcy risk, efficiency-driven FinTech (i.e., blockchain smart contracts) further reinforces core rigidity among incumbent firms and reduces both risk-taking propensity and bankruptcy risk. The study results define firms' behaviour where optimal focus on creating efficiency generates rigidity while efforts to predict uncertainties in the market environment minimise rigidity. These findings largely support our hypotheses, and we discuss the implications for firm investment and strategic risk management policy and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyan, Kwaku Alex & Galvin, Peter & Adjei-Bamfo, Peter, 2025. "Does FinTech matter for rigidity and risk aversion among incumbent firms?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001556
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.