IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v92y2025ics0927538x25001295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does distance matter? Geographic proximity to EPBs and corporate environmental investment: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xiaotong
  • Zhang, Yuan
  • Zhu, Bing
  • Shen, Liding

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of geographic proximity to Environmental Protection Bureaus (EPBs) on corporate environmental investments by firms in heavily polluting industries. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies in heavily polluting industries from 2000 to 2020, we find that geographic proximity to EPBs is positively associated with corporate environmental investment. Specifically, firms located closer to EPBs tend to invest more in environmental protection. This relationship remains robust even after addressing potential endogeneity concerns and holds consistently across alternative measures of regulatory distance and various city classifications. Mechanism analysis reveals that the increased environmental investment induced by geographic proximity to EPBs occurs through the strengthened local government environmental enforcement. Further analysis indicates that the negative impact of greater geographic distance on environmental investment is more pronounced for firms operating in opaque information environments and those facing higher transportation costs. Additionally, cross-sectional tests show that this negative effect is more pronounced when EPBs face greater environmental protection pressures and when firms are state-owned enterprises (SOEs) or face fewer financial constraints. Overall, our study identifies geographic proximity to EPBs as a critical factor influencing corporate environmental investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xiaotong & Zhang, Yuan & Zhu, Bing & Shen, Liding, 2025. "Does distance matter? Geographic proximity to EPBs and corporate environmental investment: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001295
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.