IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v92y2025ics0927538x25001246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond greenwashing: How does firm-level biodiversity disclosure affect corporate sustainability strategy?

Author

Listed:
  • He, Feng
  • Wei, Chunyang
  • Lucey, Brian
  • Hao, Jing

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of firm-level biodiversity disclosure on corporate sustainability strategy. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2022, we find that a higher level of firm-level biodiversity disclosure is associated with a reduction in corporate green washing tendency, which is measured by the ESG report textual similarity. This effect is mainly achieved through reduction in information asymmetry and the promotion of green transition. Cross-sectional heterogeneity test reveals that the impact is more pronounced in firms with lower media coverage, firms in non-heavy-polluting industries, firms with weaker environmental regulations pressure, and firms with lower managerial myopia. Further analysis shows that increased firm-level biodiversity disclosure also enhances the tone of ESG reports and alleviate corporate financing constraints. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the economic impacts of environmental disclosure and expands the literature on the determinants of corporate sustainability strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Feng & Wei, Chunyang & Lucey, Brian & Hao, Jing, 2025. "Beyond greenwashing: How does firm-level biodiversity disclosure affect corporate sustainability strategy?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001246
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001246
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x25001246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.