IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v55y2019icp182-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which model best explains the returns of large Australian stocks?

Author

Listed:
  • Chai, Daniel
  • Chiah, Mardy
  • Gharghori, Philip

Abstract

Equity markets outside the US are generally dominated by small-sized stocks that are outside the investable universe of institutional investors and professional money managers. In this paper, we compare the performance of a range of competing factor models in pricing large Australian stocks. By doing so, we shed light on the mixed findings in prior studies and the issue of national and international pricing of assets. Using a comprehensive sample spanning a period of 35 years, we document that the Fama and French (2015) five-factor model is superior despite a few close matches with some of the competing models. As the sample expands from the top 300 to the top 500 stocks, the superiority of the five-factor model becomes more apparent. There is also evidence that profitability and investment factors help to explain the cross-section of stock returns. Finally, although large Australian stocks are integrated with the US market, domestic factors are more important drivers of expected returns in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Chai, Daniel & Chiah, Mardy & Gharghori, Philip, 2019. "Which model best explains the returns of large Australian stocks?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 182-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:182-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X19301155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hoang, Khoa & Cannavan, Damien & Gaunt, Clive & Huang, Ronghong, 2019. "Is that factor just lucky? Australian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Asmâa ALAOUI TAIB & Safae BENFEDDOUL, 2023. "Explaining the time series of stock returns," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 14(2), pages 2-16, December.
    3. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam & Bianchi, Robert J. & Pham, Nga, 2021. "False discoveries in the anomaly research: New insights from the Stock Exchange of Melbourne (1927–1987)," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Xiaoyue Chen & Bin Li & Andrew C. Worthington, 2022. "Economic uncertainty and Australian stock returns," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3441-3474, September.
    5. Simkus, Matthew & Truong, Helen & Hoang, Khoa & Huang, Ronghong, 2022. "Economic uncertainty and cross section of stock returns: Australian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Huynh, Nhan, 2023. "Unemployment beta and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from Australia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Anomalies; Asset pricing; Fama-French model; International equity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:182-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.