IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v59y2002i1p3-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of models for estimation of groundwater recharge, using data from a deep weighing lysimeter

Author

Listed:
  • Chapman, T.G.
  • Malone, R.W.

Abstract

Most conceptual models of catchment hydrology include algorithms for estimation of recharge to groundwater, which is then routed to stream base flow and/or deep regional groundwater. The majority of models attempt to simulate the process of percolation to groundwater from an overlying soil water store, which may be conceived as a single store or a series combination of stores. However, these models have seldom been tested against field observations, and therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the performance of 13 single store and two-store models, selected from the literature, using an 11 years daily record from a weighing lysimeter 2.4m deep at Coshocton, OH, supporting a pasture grass. The percolation data are measured directly, while the volume of water in the soil column is measured by weighing the monolith every 5min. Use of data from three adjacent non-weighing lysimeters enabled an assessment of the spatial variability of groundwater recharge. The results of the study show that five models perform well in simulating recharge to a level consistent with spatial variability over a scale of a few metres, but did not perform as well in simulating variations of total soil water in the column, particularly during periods of high evapotranspiration. All the models, however, tend to underestimate the sharp peaks in recharge which may occur in extreme events.

Suggested Citation

  • Chapman, T.G. & Malone, R.W., 2002. "Comparison of models for estimation of groundwater recharge, using data from a deep weighing lysimeter," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 3-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:59:y:2002:i:1:p:3-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475401003895
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:59:y:2002:i:1:p:3-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.