Author
Listed:
- Leyval, Lydie
- Montmain, Jacky
- Gentil, Sylviane
Abstract
Supervision systems aim to provide operators with help to interpret the actual behaviour of the process in order that they can watch it over more efficiently. They are not conceived so as to replace completely the humans in charge of the plant, but rather to detect early abnormal situations and to explain them so that operators can take right and efficient decisions. At the end the operators have still to decide whether the proposed diagnosis or action is valid or not; as a consequence the supervision system must be able to justify at any time its reasonings with explanations. In our approach, the model of a process is expressed as a graph whose nodes are relevant variables and whose arcs represent the causal relations between them. It is not only a good representation of the process behaviour, but also an efficient knowledge base used by the simulation and the fault diagnosis system to deduce the effects of actions, disturbances or faults on the behaviour. The simulation and the error calculus are purely numerical treatments, and the qualitative analysis concerns diagnosis: the simulation results are qualitatively interpreted with regard to the actual behaviour, in order to decide whether the situation is normal or not. The fault detection and isolation are considered as decision-making processes in a vague context. The use of fuzzy sets theory is an adequate method to manage with the imprecision of the modelling and of the data and then to elaborate an efficient numerical-symbolic interface between low level information (data supplied by sensors) and high level concepts (normal or faulty situation).
Suggested Citation
Leyval, Lydie & Montmain, Jacky & Gentil, Sylviane, 1994.
"Qualitative analysis for decision making in supervision of industrial continuous processes,"
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 149-163.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:matcom:v:36:y:1994:i:2:p:149-163
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4754(94)90029-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:36:y:1994:i:2:p:149-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.