IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v241y2026ipbp542-572.html

Research on supply chain risk evaluation of online to offline e-commerce enterprises based on catastrophe progression method

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Nian
  • Zhu, Yue
  • Zheng, Shuo
  • Pan, Qiang

Abstract

Risk assessment of online-to-offline (O2O) e-commerce enterprises holds significant strategic value for improving supply chain collaborative governance mechanisms and enhancing overall operational efficiency. The research objective of this study is to construct a practically applicable and theoretically grounded risk evaluation model that reflects the unique structural and behavioral complexities of O2O e-commerce supply chain. The research problem is the lack of comprehensive, behavior-sensitive frameworks for systematically evaluating the multidimensional, nonlinear, and abrupt risks inherent in O2O e-commerce supply chains. To mitigate the shortcoming, the research method integrates Social Network Analysis (SNA), semantic clustering, and grounded theory to systematically develop a robust risk index system. The system comprises well-structured indicators evaluated through linguistic variables and expert judgment, capturing complex risk characteristics across the supply chain. The indicators are classified into five categories: environmental, market, operational, collaborative, and technological, corresponding to factors such as policy uncertainty, demand fluctuations, financial instability, partner conflicts, and digital vulnerabilities. In the assessment phase, an improved catastrophe progression method is applied. The maximizing deviation method is employed to determine objective weights and capture the nonlinear and abrupt nature of supply chain risks. A case study focusing on a travel-oriented O2O e-commerce platform is conducted to validate the model. Moreover, the research findings confirm the model’s effectiveness in identifying and prioritizing key risk dimensions, particularly in areas such as information security and customer satisfaction. Despite its contributions, the limitation of the study lies in the constrained scope of semantic data and the relatively small sample size used in the questionnaire survey for empirical validation. As a future direction, expanding data sources and applying the model across diverse O2O sectors would enhance its generalizability and practical relevance. This study contributes a structured and behavior-aware approach to O2O supply chain risk evaluation, with both theoretical and managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Nian & Zhu, Yue & Zheng, Shuo & Pan, Qiang, 2026. "Research on supply chain risk evaluation of online to offline e-commerce enterprises based on catastrophe progression method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 241(PB), pages 542-572.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:241:y:2026:i:pb:p:542-572
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2025.10.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475425004343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2025.10.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Elson Kosasih & Fabrizio Margaroli & Simone Gelli & Ajmal Aziz & Nick Wildgoose & Alexandra Brintrup, 2024. "Towards knowledge graph reasoning for supply chain risk management using graph neural networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(15), pages 5596-5612, August.
    2. Pinyi Yao & Syuhaily Osman & Mohamad Fazli Sabri & Norzalina Zainudin, 2022. "Consumer Behavior in Online-to-Offline (O2O) Commerce: A Thematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Du, Zhong & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Fenghao, 2023. "O2O dual-channel sales: Choices of pricing policy and delivery mode for a restaurant," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Saha, Esha & Rathore, Pradeep, 2024. "The impact of healthcare 4.0 technologies on healthcare supply chain performance: Extending the organizational information processing theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. He, Zhou & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dong, Jichang & Wang, Shouyang, 2016. "Evolutionary location and pricing strategies for service merchants in competitive O2O markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 595-609.
    6. Ualison Rébula De Oliveira & Gabriela Costa Dias & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes, 2024. "Evaluation of a conceptual model of supply chain risk management to import/export process of an automotive industry: an action research approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 201-219, March.
    7. Pei, Zhi & Ghose, Sanjoy & Yan, Ruiliang & Zhou, Steve B. & Yan, Angela, 2024. "The strategic value of buy online and pick up from store service to the dual channel coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Wenke Wang & Qilin Cao & Yang Liu & Cheng Zhou & Qinghui Jiao & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2024. "Risk management of green supply chains for agricultural products based on social network evaluation framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4913-4934, July.
    9. John R. Macdonald & Christopher W. Zobel & Steven A. Melnyk & Stanley E. Griffis, 2018. "Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 4337-4355, June.
    10. Sun, Yanru & Sun, Hao & Sun, Panfei & Jin, Xuanzhu, 2024. "A dynamic surge pricing model throughout product lifecycle," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 139-151.
    11. Pei, Zhi & Wooldridge, Barbara Ross & Swimberghe, Krist R., 2021. "Manufacturer rebate and channel coordination in O2O retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Li, Qingying & Zhu, Shuo & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Shen, Bin, 2025. "Maintaining E-commerce supply chain viability: Addressing supply risks with a strategic live-streaming channel," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Araújo Santos, P. & Fraga Alves, M.I., 2013. "Forecasting Value-at-Risk with a duration-based POT method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-309.
    14. Bartosz Sawik, 2024. "Optimizing Last-Mile Delivery: A Multi-Criteria Approach with Automated Smart Lockers, Capillary Distribution and Crowdshipping," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, May.
    15. Bartosz Sawik, 2023. "Space Mission Risk, Sustainability and Supply Chain: Review, Multi-Objective Optimization Model and Practical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Vimal Kumar & Rohit Raj & Pratima Verma & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes & Bhavin Shah, 2024. "Assessing risk and sustainability factors in spice supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 233-252, March.
    17. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    18. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    19. Xiaofeng Xie & Fengying Zhang & Li Liu & Yang Yang & Xiuying Hu, 2023. "Assessment of associated credit risk in the supply chain based on trade credit risk contagion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Leizhou Zhao, 2017. "Coordinating of O2O Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information When Disturbance Occur Online," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 132-141, December.
    21. Tadeusz Sawik & Bartosz Sawik, 2024. "Risk-averse decision-making to maintain supply chain viability under propagated disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(8), pages 2853-2867, April.
    22. Datta, Alotosh & Sarkar, Biswajit & Dey, Bikash Koli & Sangal, Isha & Yang, Liu & Fan, Shu-Kai S. & Sardar, Suman Kalyan & Thangavelu, Lakshmi, 2024. "The impact of sales effort on a dual-channel dynamical system under a price-sensitive stochastic demand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    23. Di (Andrew) Wu, 2024. "Text-Based Measure of Supply Chain Risk Exposure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4781-4801, July.
    24. Bo Huang & Wei Gan, 2023. "Construction and application of computerized risk assessment model for supply chain finance under technology empowerment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, May.
    25. Minguito, Glenda & Banluta, Jenith, 2023. "Risk management in humanitarian supply chain based on FMEA and grey relational analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra, 2024. "Learning from the Past Bridging Digital and Physical Markets: A Guidelines for Future Research Agenda of Online-to-Offline (O2O) Marketing Strategy," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 82-96, May.
    2. Hart Nibbrig, Maurice & Sharif Azadeh, Shadi & Maknoon, M.Y., 2025. "Adaptive resilience strategies for supply chain networks against disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    4. Biswajit Sarkar & Bikash Koli Dey & Mitali Sarkar & Ali AlArjani, 2021. "A Sustainable Online-to-Offline (O2O) Retailing Strategy for a Supply Chain Management under Controllable Lead Time and Variable Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Yang, Yi & Peng, Chen & Cao, En-Zhi, 2025. "Design of supply chain resilience strategies from the product life cycle perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Yoon, Sangjun & Kim, Gwang & Shin, Youngchul, 2025. "Next-day demand based last-mile delivery route optimization with collection of reusable bags," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Wan Qin & Peng Yuhan & Yu Cuiting & Huang Yu & Liu Danping, 2023. "Optimal Strategies of the Online-to-Offline Instant Delivery Service of Grocery Retailers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    8. Neungho Han & Juneho Um, 2024. "Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Dmitry Ivanov & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1191-1210, December.
    10. Gong, Canran & Song, Huaming & Chen, Daqiang & Day, Steven James & Ignatius, Joshua, 2024. "Logistics sourcing of e-commerce firms considering promised delivery time and environmental sustainability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 60-75.
    11. Hai Thanh Pham & Chiara Verbano, 2022. "Identification and Characterization of Supply Chain Operational Risk Profiles in Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Huynh, Nhan & Le, Quynh Nga, 2025. "From chain to capital: Supply chain risks and working capital management," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    13. Fan, Siyu & Kong, Dongmin & Wu, Yifei & Yu, Honghai, 2025. "Digital innovation and supply chain risk: A large language model-based analysis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Zhan, Sha-lei & Ignatius, Joshua & Ng, Chi To & Chen, Daqiang, 2025. "Supply chain network viability: Managing disruption risk via dynamic data and interaction models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Jiang, Yuqing & Liu, Fan & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "Digital coupon promotion and platform selection in the presence of delivery effort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Kowoon Kim & Hong-Youl Ha, 2023. "Do Changes in Attribute Weights between Two Platforms Alter Interplay Effects in the O2O Era? Two Time-Lag Intervals in the Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Pei-Ju Wu, 2023. "O2O switching determinants and successful drivers in omnichannel retailing services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 771-788, September.
    18. Qing Yang & Lei Xiong & Yanfeng Li & Qian Chen & Yijing Yu & Jingyang Wang, 2022. "Contract Coordination of Fresh Agri-Product Supply Chain under O2O Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Fan, Siyu & Wu, Yifei & Yang, Ruochen, 2025. "Measuring firm-level supply chain risk using a generative large language model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Xuanpu Lin & Guoman She & Aaron Yoon & Haoran Zhu, 2025. "Shareholder value implications of supply chain ESG: evidence from negative incidents," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2185-2217, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:241:y:2026:i:pb:p:542-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.