IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v127y2016icp131-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resonant solitons from the 3×3 operator

Author

Listed:
  • Kaup, D.J.
  • Van Gorder, Robert A.

Abstract

The features of the resonant soliton of the 3×3 operator is studied and detailed. The scattering data of this operator contains four transmission coefficients, two in each half complex ζ-plane, where ζ is the spectral parameter. When the potential matrix has anti-hermitian symmetry (Qα,β=−Qβ,α*), each of the two transmission coefficients in the lower half plane become equal to the complex conjugates of one of the two in the upper half plane, leaving only two independent transmission coefficients, which is taken to be those in the upper half plane. The bound state scattering data for this operator consists of the zeros of these two transmission coefficients (bound state eigenvalues) and a normalization coefficient associated with each eigenvalue. With two transmission coefficients, there is a wider variety of possible soliton solutions than in the Zakharov–Shabat (ZS) 2×2 case. First, the eigenvalues could belong to only one transmission coefficient, with the other transmission coefficient having none. In this case the soliton solution will only exist in one of the two conjugate pairs of components of Q lying next to the diagonal, with all other components of Q vanishing. These soliton solutions will be equivalent to those in the ZS case, up to scaling factors. If one would distribute the eigenvalues among both transmission coefficients so that each transmission coefficient would have at least one eigenvalue, the soliton structure becomes more complex. In this case, any one eigenvalue will be found to generally make contributions to all non-diagonal components of Q. Of particular interest, inside this class is a special class of solitons which exist only when these two transmission coefficients have exactly equal eigenvalues. Equality of eigenvalues from different transmission coefficients give rise to “resonant solitons”. This latter class is the case which is treated here. It is found that there are two different states for the resonant soliton solution, both of which arise from a bifurcation. The bifurcation is shown to arise from the algebraic structure of the 3×3 scattering matrix. The linear dispersion relations (the solution of the inverse scattering problem) are also extended to the case when resonant solitons are present. It is further shown that the same result could be obtained by taking the limit of the eigenvalues in each transmission coefficient approaching the other. The general soliton solution under anti-hermitian symmetry is studied when there is only one eigenvalue in each transmission coefficient, with each unequal to the other. The asymptotics of this solution is detailed and then the same is done when the eigenvalues are exactly equal, showing that the latter contains the well known parametric interactions of “up-conversion” and “down-conversion”. Lastly, it is pointed out how this equality of eigenvalues in different transmission coefficients can be interpreted as a “nonlinear resonance condition”.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaup, D.J. & Van Gorder, Robert A., 2016. "Resonant solitons from the 3×3 operator," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 131-150.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:131-150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2012.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475412002832
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:131-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.