IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v44y2014icp120-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fishery-seal interactions in Irish waters: Current perspectives and future research priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Cronin, M.
  • Jessopp, M.
  • Houle, J.
  • Reid, D.

Abstract

Interactions between seals and the fishing industry are an on-going problem in Ireland and indeed globally across the range of most seal species. These interactions occur at both the operational (seal damage to catches and fishing gear) and biological (competition for shared resources) level. With declines in fish stocks there has been increased interest in the extent of competition for resources between commercial fisheries and seals. High levels of seal damage perceived by the fishing industry has led to frequent calls for seal culls, highlighting the significance of the problem. However, the scale of interaction between seals and commercial fishing and aquaculture in Ireland heretofore remained unclear. A comprehensive review of existing data, augmented with data from key stakeholders on the current state of play is presented to provide a realistic and representative account of the situation. This suggests that seal interactions with commercial fisheries in Ireland are most significant in inshore (<12 nautical miles from shore) static-net (or passive) fisheries (e.g. gill/tangle nets) and have increased following the driftnet ban in 2006, which suggests displacement of seal interactions from salmon to other fisheries. The industry highlighted pollack, angler fish, cod, and turbot fisheries as the main inshore fisheries currently impacted by operational damage to gear and catch by seals. Seal damage to line-caught salmon continues, with industry feedback suggesting large geographical variation in the range of damage levels reported. Salmon farming installations are also increasingly being targeted by seals, with significant losses due to seal depredation being reported. In the absence of robust data on seal depredation, the extent to which changes in fishing gear and practices have reduced damage levels, or resulted in displacement of seal foraging effort, is unknown. Recommendations are made to suggest how research efforts should be focused to address critical data gaps identified in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Cronin, M. & Jessopp, M. & Houle, J. & Reid, D., 2014. "Fishery-seal interactions in Irish waters: Current perspectives and future research priorities," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 120-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:120-130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X13001693
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooke, Justin & Leaper, Russell & Wade, Paul & Lavigne, David & Taylor, Barbara, 2012. "Management rules for marine mammal populations: A response to Lonergan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 389-392.
    2. Kenneth T. Frank & Brian Petrie & Jonathan A. D. Fisher & William C. Leggett, 2011. "Transient dynamics of an altered large marine ecosystem," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7362), pages 86-89, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torbjörn Jansson & Staffan Waldo, 2022. "Managing Marine Mammals and Fisheries: A Calibrated Programming Model for the Seal-Fishery Interaction in Sweden," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 501-530, March.
    2. Ocampo Reinaldo, Matías & Milessi, Andrés C. & Romero, María Alejandra & Crespo, Enrique & Wolff, Matthias & González, Raúl A., 2016. "Assessing the effects of demersal fishing and conservation strategies of marine mammals over a Patagonian food web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 31-43.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chongliang & Chen, Yong & Ren, Yiping, 2016. "The efficacy of fisheries closure in rebuilding depleted stocks: Lessons from size-spectrum modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 59-66.
    2. Lei Zhao & Mingguo Wang & Zhongyao Liang & Qichao Zhou, 2020. "Identification of Regime Shifts and Their Potential Drivers in the Shallow Eutrophic Lake Yilong, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Castellani, Marco & Rosland, Rune & Urtizberea, Agurtzane & Fiksen, Øyvind, 2013. "A mass-balanced pelagic ecosystem model with size-structured behaviourally adaptive zooplankton and fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 54-63.
    4. Rudi Voss & Martin F Quaas & Jörn O Schmidt & Olli Tahvonen & Martin Lindegren & Christian Möllmann, 2014. "Assessing Social – Ecological Trade-Offs to Advance Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-8, September.
    5. Maroto, José M. & Morán, Manuel, 2019. "Transient dynamics: Equilibrium, collapse, and extinction in age-structured models. The case of the Northern cod stock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 35-43.
    6. Domenico De Giovanni & Fabio Lamantia, 2018. "Dynamic Harvesting Under Imperfect Catch Control," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 252-267, January.
    7. Trisha L Spanbauer & Craig R Allen & David G Angeler & Tarsha Eason & Sherilyn C Fritz & Ahjond S Garmestani & Kirsty L Nash & Jeffery R Stone, 2014. "Prolonged Instability Prior to a Regime Shift," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-7, October.
    8. Anne Hollowed & Enrique Curchitser & Charles Stock & Chang Zhang, 2013. "Trade-offs associated with different modeling approaches for assessment of fish and shellfish responses to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 111-129, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:120-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.