IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v28y2004i4p335-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory socioeconomic analysis: drawing on fishermen's knowledge for marine protected area planning in California

Author

Listed:
  • Scholz, Astrid
  • Bonzon, Kate
  • Fujita, Rod
  • Benjamin, Natasha
  • Woodling, Nicole
  • Black, Peter
  • Steinback, Charles

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to test the utility of geospatial analysis tools for eliciting and integrating fishermen's1 knowledge into marine protected area (MPA) planning processes in California, United States. A participatory design yielded 30 local knowledge interviews that were coded for socioeconomic and biodiversity information. The resulting information is useful in understanding past conflicts around MPA siting proposals and for identifying likely sources of agreement and disagreement. Products include a protocol for rapid socioeconomic assessment; a database of fishermen's knowledge and information; and a geographic information system for further use in California's MPA planning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Scholz, Astrid & Bonzon, Kate & Fujita, Rod & Benjamin, Natasha & Woodling, Nicole & Black, Peter & Steinback, Charles, 2004. "Participatory socioeconomic analysis: drawing on fishermen's knowledge for marine protected area planning in California," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 335-349, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:28:y:2004:i:4:p:335-349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(03)00111-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cook, Taylor C. & James, Kira & Bearzi, Maddalena, 2015. "Angler perceptions of California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) depredation and marine policy in Southern California," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 573-583.
    2. Raffaele Giordano & Elisabetta Preziosi & Emanuele Romano, 2013. "Integration of local and scientific knowledge to support drought impact monitoring: some hints from an Italian case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 523-544, October.
    3. Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Andrea Rocchi & Stefano Cerioni & Gaetano Zarlenga & Nicolò Passeri & Francesco Piacentini & Cristina Lo Fazio & Cristina Gerardis & Clara Cicatiello, 2022. "Conveying environmental information to fishers: a smartphone application on marine protected areas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 453-465, September.
    4. Dentoni, Domenico & Klerkx, Laurens, 2015. "Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 259-271.
    5. Antonio Di Cintio & Federico Niccolini & Sara Scipioni & Fabio Bulleri, 2023. "Avoiding “Paper Parks”: A Global Literature Review on Socioeconomic Factors Underpinning the Effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Burt, Jenn M. & Akins, Phillip & Latham, Erin & Beck, Martina & Salomon, Anne K. & Ban, Natalie, 2014. "Marine protected area network design features that support resilient human-ocean systems: Applications for British Columbia, Canada," MarXiv 9tdhv, Center for Open Science.
    7. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    8. Turner, Rachel A. & Polunin, Nicholas V.C. & Stead, Selina M., 2015. "Mapping inshore fisheries: Comparing observed and perceived distributions of pot fishing activity in Northumberland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 173-181.
    9. Peterson, Megan J. & Carothers, Courtney, 2013. "Whale interactions with Alaskan sablefish and Pacific halibut fisheries: Surveying fishermen perception, changing fishing practices and mitigation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 315-324.
    10. Peckett, Frances J. & Glegg, Gillian A. & Rodwell, Lynda D., 2014. "Assessing the quality of data required to identify effective marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 333-341.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:28:y:2004:i:4:p:335-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.