IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v82y2019icp147-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-development of a former military training area—The case of Brdy told from a local actors’ perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Klusáček, Petr
  • Martinát, Stanislav
  • Krejčí, Tomáš
  • Bartke, Stephan

Abstract

Military training areas (MTAs) are special spatial units. Closed and inaccessible for the general public, they have been shaped by long-term military use of various potential type and intensity. Following the suspension of operation, some MTAs fell derelict and buildings and infrastructures on it become brownfields. Local municipalities will have strong interests and will care about the re-development options – either in utilising potentials or in preventing competitions. We take a Czech example and use in-depth semi-structured interviews to investigate the how local actors perceived and influenced the re-development perspectives of the former MTA Brdy, Czech Republic. This case is interesting, because international and national politics in as much as different groups of local stakeholders played significant roles in creating opportunities and for holding or pushing a re- or new development on the military brownfield land. Next to the results of the qualitative interviews with local stakeholders, we include analysis of available statistical data and information about the case study municipalities. Our contribution gives an insightful investigation about the role that local actors played in determining new uses of the former MTA in uncertain and unstable socio-economic and political conditions typical for post-communist and developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Klusáček, Petr & Martinát, Stanislav & Krejčí, Tomáš & Bartke, Stephan, 2019. "Re-development of a former military training area—The case of Brdy told from a local actors’ perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 147-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:147-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718311372
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard Hartmuth & Katja Huber & Dieter Rink, 2008. "Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 261-270.
    2. Burmaoglu, Serhat & Sarıtas, Ozcan, 2017. "Changing characteristics of warfare and the future of Military R&D," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 151-161.
    3. Havlíček, Marek & Skokanová, Hana & Dostál, Ivo & Vymazalová, Marie & Pavelková, Renata & Petrovič, František, 2018. "The consequences of establishing military training areas for land use development—A case study of Libavá, Czech Republic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svenningsen, Stig Roar & Levin, Gregor & Perner, Mads Linnet, 2019. "Military land use and the impact on landscape: A study of land use history on Danish Defence sites," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 114-126.
    2. Eshrati, Dorna & Eshrati, Parastoo, 2022. "Urban conservation in the public eye: Evaluating the integrity achieved in the rehabilitation plan of Karim-Khan Zand Complex, Shiraz, Iran based on people’s perceptions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Tomáš Krejčí & Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Ryan J. Frazier & Petr Klusáček & Kamil Pícha & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2021. "Spatial Unevenness of Formation, Remediation and Persistence of Post-Agricultural Brownfields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Josef Navrátil & Tomáš Krejčí & Stanislav Martinát & Kamil Pícha & Petr Klusáček & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2020. "Abandonment or Regeneration and Re-Use? Factors Affecting the Usage of Farm Premises in Different Social Spaces of the Rural," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Ania Ankowska, 2023. "A set of 99 healthy city indicators for application in urban planning and design," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1978-1989, June.
    2. Leonardo S. Alaimo & Filomena Maggino, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals Indicators at Territorial Level: Conceptual and Methodological Issues—The Italian Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 383-419, January.
    3. Pekka Halla & Albert Merino‐Saum, 2022. "Conceptual frameworks in indicator‐based assessments of urban sustainability—An analysis based on 67 initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1056-1071, October.
    4. Marula Tsagkari & Jordi Roca & Phedeas Stephanides, 2022. "Sustainability of local renewable energy projects: A comprehensive framework and an empirical analysis on two islands," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1155-1168, October.
    5. Jedlička Jiří & Dostál Ivo & Huzlík Jiří & Havlíček Marek & Skokanová Hana, 2019. "Assessing relationships between land use changes and the development of a road network in the Hodonín region (Czech Republic)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 145-159, March.
    6. František Murgaš & František Petrovič & Anna Tirpáková, 2022. "Social Capital as a Predictor of Quality of Life: The Czech Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Lee, Jun Gon & Park, Min Jae, 2019. "Rethinking the national defense R&D innovation system for latecomer: Defense R&D governance matrix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Ozcan Saritas & Derrick Ababio Anim, 2017. "The Last and Next 10 Years of Foresight," HSE Working papers WP BRP 77/STI/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Svenningsen, Stig Roar & Levin, Gregor & Perner, Mads Linnet, 2019. "Military land use and the impact on landscape: A study of land use history on Danish Defence sites," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 114-126.
    11. Meng, Jia-Hui & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The policy trajectory of dual-use technology integration governance in China: A sequential analysis of policy evolution," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Srimayi Tenali & Phil McManus, 2022. "Climate change acknowledgment to promote sustainable development: A critical discourse analysis of local action plans in coastal Florida," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1072-1085, October.
    13. Olimpia Neagu & Doru Ioan Ardelean & Vasile Lazar, 2017. "Conceiving The Sustainable Development Strategic Objectives Of Oas Area, Satu Mare County, On The Basis Of Natural Capital Assessment," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 124-129, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:147-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.