IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v132y2023ics0264837723002545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborating for longleaf pine: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Randall, Hampton
  • Brewitt, Peter

Abstract

Since the mid 1990′s collaborative landscape management, involving varied land users and interest groups, has increased substantially but the utilization of this practice on private land has been sparsely studied. Alongside this increase in collaborative landscape management, there has been an increase in attention on longleaf pine restoration. Once spanning over 93 million acres in the southeastern United States, these trees were reduced to an estimated 3% of their historic range. In response, in 2009, 22 government agencies and independent organizations formed America’s Longleaf Restoration Initiative. The initiative functions in part through local implementation teams, established throughout the range and focused on private as well as public land. To learn more about collaboration and private land, we studied one of the teams, the Sewee Longleaf Conservation Cooperative, in South Carolina.Drawing on the Advocacy Coalition Framework, a well-established model for analysing policy structures and change, we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with partner organizations to analyze the group’s functions and the frames through which stakeholders view the coalition, their role, and the mission. We found that it has successfully made itself into the policy subsystem for the area and a venue that encompasses all relevant stakeholders. The stakeholders frame longleaf restoration as a positive, at least a secondary belief, and there is minimal conflict surrounding core beliefs. These stakeholders see the collaboration as positive, laud the group’s ability to facilitate access to resources, and utilize the relationship to establish connections, broaden outreach, and develop policy. But while this is a successful collaboration, its successes may be challenged by future events from outside the policy subsystem

Suggested Citation

  • Randall, Hampton & Brewitt, Peter, 2023. "Collaborating for longleaf pine: A case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002545
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723002545
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanh T. N. Nguyen & Daniel G. Scognamillo & Christopher E. Comer, 2019. "Revealing Community Perceptions for Ecological Restoration Using a Soft System Methodology," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 429-442, August.
    2. Foster, Michaela & Peterson, M. Nils & Cubbage, Frederick & McMahon, Gerard, 2019. "Evaluating natural resource planning for longleaf pine ecosystems in the Southeast United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 142-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Paula Flórez Jiménez & Ángela María Plata & Andrés Acero & Luz Stella Gaona & Álex Smith Araque & Didier Sierra, 2021. "Participatory Analysis of Small-Scale Artisanal Gold Mining in the Santa Rita District, Municipality of Andes, Antioquia, Based on the PAIIO Methodology," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 669-681, December.
    2. Vanessa Batista Schramm & Alexandre de Araújo Gomes Júnior & Fernando Schramm, 2022. "Facilitation Model for Supporting Integrative Water Resource Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 4913-4931, October.
    3. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    4. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.