IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics0264837721003641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Easement spatialization with two cases based on LADM and BIM

Author

Listed:
  • Ying, Shen
  • Xu, Yifan
  • Li, Chengpeng
  • Guo, Renzhong
  • Li, Lin

Abstract

An easement is an important usufructuary right, and its main purpose is that one party wants to use the property of others to improve the benefits and interests of his own real estate. Because of the increasing population and accelerating urbanization urban planners have focused on the development and utilization of three-dimensional urban space, namely, underground, near ground and aboveground space, to use the spatial resources fully. Therefore, jurisprudence-confined planar easement must be combined with spatial information from two dimensions (2D) to three dimensions (3D), as well as 2D property boundaries to be extended to 3D to adapt to urban development. This paper focuses on the easement of access, which is the right to cross the property to go to and from another, under the context of 3D cadastres. The model of easement spatialization based on BIM (Building Information Model) specified by IFC (Industry Foundation Class) standards is constructed and analysed. The servient owner and the dominant owner of the easement can be linked because they are both attached to the same physical space. This paper takes a multistory building having individually owned condominium units as an example to demonstrate how to access the semantic information associated with the geometric information of 3D property objects in the BIM/IFC. The research results show that BIM/IFC can optimize the complex presentation of 3D property attributes and is an effective carrier of easement spatialization. The combination of legal information and spatial information of 3D properties not only optimizes the operation and maintenance of buildings but also improves land management and accelerates the development of 3D cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying, Shen & Xu, Yifan & Li, Chengpeng & Guo, Renzhong & Li, Lin, 2021. "Easement spatialization with two cases based on LADM and BIM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003641
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721003641
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalogianni, Eftychia & Dimopoulou, Efi & Thompson, Rodney James & Lemmen, Christiaan & Ying, Shen & van Oosterom, Peter, 2020. "Development of 3D spatial profiles to support the full lifecycle of 3D objects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Alattas, Abdullah & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alzahrani, Thamer & Zlatanova, Sisi & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Mapping private, common, and exclusive common spaces in buildings from BIM/IFC to LADM. A case study from Saudi Arabia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Zhuo, Yuefei & Xu, Zhongguo & Li, Guan & Liao, Rong & Lemmen, Christiaan & Wu, Cifang & Wu, Yuzhe, 2020. "LADM-based profile for farmland Tripartite Entitlement System in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hicret Gürsoy Sürmeneli & Mila Koeva & Mehmet Alkan, 2022. "The Application Domain Extension (ADE) 4D Cadastral Data Model and Its Application in Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    2. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamad Almujibah, 2023. "Assessment of Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a Time and Cost-Saving Construction Management Tool: Evidence from Two-Story Villas in Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Josip Lisjak & Miodrag Roić & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić Ivić, 2021. "Croatian LADM Profile Extension for State-Owned Agricultural Land Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Tingting Fang & Yuefei Zhuo & Cifang Wu & Yihu Zhou & Zhongguo Xu & Guan Li, 2022. "Exploration of Informal Farmland Leasing Mode: A Case Study of Huang Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Bahram Saeidian & Abbas Rajabifard & Behnam Atazadeh & Mohsen Kalantari, 2021. "Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Hicret Gürsoy Sürmeneli & Mila Koeva & Mehmet Alkan, 2022. "The Application Domain Extension (ADE) 4D Cadastral Data Model and Its Application in Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    6. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Thompson, Rodney & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Bi-temporal foundation for LADM v2: Fusing event and state based modelling of Land administration data 2D and 3D," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Hongguang Zheng & Zhanbin Zhang, 2021. "Analyzing Characteristics and Implications of the Mortgage Default of Agricultural Land Management Rights in Recent China Based on 724 Court Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Easement; LADM; BIM; IFC; 3D property;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.