IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/labeco/v99y2026ics0927537126000138.html

China’s labour market liberalization harmed women, but more so in regions with traditional gender norms

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Qi
  • Zhao, Bin

Abstract

China’s labour market liberalization since the early 1980s coincided with rapid economic growth but also to a decline in female labour force participation (LFP). We examine how persistent gender norms influenced this decline, exploiting provincial variation in the staggered rollout of the labour contract system. Local gender norms are proxied by the historical density of patrilineal genealogy books. Using a difference-in-differences-in-differences design, we find that traditional gender norms amplify the negative impact of labour market liberalization on women’s LFP. A one-standard-deviation increase in norms lowers female LFP by an additional 3.4 percentage points relative to men, while women in the top quartile of gender norms experience an 8.3-percentage-point greater decline. Event-study evidence shows that these effects are concentrated among women in high-norm regions, whereas men’s LFP remains largely unaffected. Our results highlight how cultural persistence can condition the labour market consequences of major economic reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Qi & Zhao, Bin, 2026. "China’s labour market liberalization harmed women, but more so in regions with traditional gender norms," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0927537126000138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2026.102862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537126000138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.labeco.2026.102862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J00 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - General
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0927537126000138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/labeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.