Author
Listed:
- Ravindran, Kajena
- Saba, Manuel
- Mehrvar, Mehrab
- Sekercioglu, Fatih
- Bustillo-LeCompte, Ciro
Abstract
The provision of safe drinking water depends on regular system maintenance and strict compliance with public health regulations. In Ontario, Canada, Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) are responsible for enforcing standards for small drinking water systems (SDWS), which often serve rural and resource-limited communities. This study examined the facilitators and barriers influencing the effectiveness of SDWS oversight from the perspective of frontline PHIs. An online survey was distributed to all 29 public health units in Ontario, yielding 28 responses (n = 28). The survey data underwent inductive thematic analysis to identify the key factors affecting program delivery and public health protection. Five principal themes were identified: (1) PHI knowledge and training, (2) operational and program support, (3) technological and field capacity, (4) challenges encountered by system owners and operators, and (5) legislative and regulatory compliance. Respondents indicated that, although regulations provide a helpful framework, limited training, resource constraints, and inconsistent enforcement hinder effective oversight. The findings indicate that improvements in inspector training, technological and field resources, and inter-jurisdictional coordination are fundamental for advancing the SDWS program. Strengthening SDWS effectiveness requires focused interventions in training, infrastructure, and coordination. Practitioner-identified priorities should inform future policy and funding allocation, stressing the importance of integrated, decentralized water governance.
Suggested Citation
Ravindran, Kajena & Saba, Manuel & Mehrvar, Mehrab & Sekercioglu, Fatih & Bustillo-LeCompte, Ciro, 2026.
"Examining the facilitators and barriers to public health inspector oversight of small drinking water systems in Ontario, Canada: A frontline perspective,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000135
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102154
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.