Author
Abstract
This study examines electricity security across 28 European countries from 2015 to 2024, applying a global framework to facilitate cross-country comparisons. The methodology considers system stability, accessibility, economic impacts of electricity prices, sustainable development, and governance quality. The study examines a baseline scenario and two additional scenarios: one focusing on power outages and another on household electricity prices. An extended GESI version also includes external dependence on imports. Scores are derived using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and equal weights. The results reveal that during the analysed period, electricity security varies from moderate to high among the studied countries. Notably, Northern and Western European nations generally perform better than Southern and Southeastern European countries. In all scenarios except Scenario 3, the electricity security index is primarily influenced by system stability and governance quality, while the economic impact of industrial electricity prices appears negligible. In Scenario 3, however, both the quality of governance and the economic impact of consumer electricity prices play significant roles in determining electricity security. This result indicates that the Global Electricity Security Index is highly sensitive to the chosen affordability indicator. The results remain consistent across all scenarios and weighting methods. Several policy implications arise from these findings. Energy policy should prioritise affordable electricity prices as a crucial aspect of electricity security, and there is a clear need for investment in network and distribution infrastructure.
Suggested Citation
Borowiec-Kapek, Justyna, 2026.
"Assessing electricity security in Europe: A multi-scenario application of the global electricity security index,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s095717872600010x
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102151
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s095717872600010x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.