Author
Listed:
- Durdovic, Martin
- Čermák, Daniel
Abstract
As a low-carbon baseload source, nuclear energy is experiencing a revival in policy toward climate-neutrality targets, which has been accompanied by changes in public opinion following the 2021–2023 energy crisis. This article compares data from three representative public opinion surveys (2021, 2022, and 2023) to understand the substantial rise in acceptance of nuclear energy in the Czech Republic. Our hypothesis-driven research employs multiple ordinary least squares regressions and constructs two types of models (baseline and extended) to identify drivers of acceptance, including variables on sociodemographic characteristics, country-specific situational attitudes, and attitudes toward climate change, energy security, and environmental issues. We found that while the rise in acceptance partially diminished between 2022 and 2023, the recurrent higher level of acceptance echoes enduring changes in public attitudes. Statistically, men and more educated individuals show substantial support for nuclear energy, but age was not significant. Overall, higher acceptance was positively associated with energy security and negatively with climate change concerns, yet the 2023 model suggests a possible drift toward a more favorable attitude toward nuclear energy among the climate-concerned. Similarly, the perception of economic downturn after the crisis led to reluctant acceptance of nuclear in 2023. Finally, predictors of trust indicate that it is difficult for the government to meet the expectations of nuclear energy supporters, and the link between nuclear energy and populism is weaker than in other countries. Our results contribute to understanding public attitudes toward nuclear energy as part of energy transitions in the post-crisis period.
Suggested Citation
Durdovic, Martin & Čermák, Daniel, 2026.
"Reinforced by the energy crisis: Nuclear revival and public opinion in the Czech Republic,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000068
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102147
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.