Author
Listed:
- Ishaq, Haris
- Siddiqui, Osamah
- Tseng, ChengJi
Abstract
Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy resources has become an imminent global objective in this era. This paper investigates the economic, social, and environmental aspects of constructing and operating the wind farm through a comprehensive social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) to assess the project's feasibility for the local Taiwanese population. The monetary values obtained were analyzed using net present value (NPV) methodology, evaluated from both publicly funded and privately owned perspectives. Key findings reveal significant differences between the two options when social and environmental factors are incorporated. Specifically, the NPV results for the publicly funded fixed-rate version are approximately 55.48 billion NTD, while the privately owned version stands at 4.18 billion NTD. Both versions are identified as profitable and feasible projects, provided the annual discount rate remains below 10.5% and 3.2%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis highlights that NPV results are particularly susceptible to fluctuations in capital costs and electricity sales income, with a 25% decrease in the feed-in tariff rate leading to a 43% drop in NPV. This finding suggests the need for a more thorough examination of these critical elements. This study is among the first to apply a comprehensive SCBA framework to an Asian offshore wind farm project, Formosa 2, incorporating not only economic but also environmental and social dimensions. By quantifying these factors, we provide novel insights into the comparative viability of publicly funded versus privately owned models, offering a holistic evidence base to guide renewable energy policy and investment in emerging markets.
Suggested Citation
Ishaq, Haris & Siddiqui, Osamah & Tseng, ChengJi, 2026.
"Replacing conventional energy resources with wind: An integrated economic, environmental, and social assessment,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725002000
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102085
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725002000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.