IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v99y2026ics0957178725002000.html

Replacing conventional energy resources with wind: An integrated economic, environmental, and social assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ishaq, Haris
  • Siddiqui, Osamah
  • Tseng, ChengJi

Abstract

Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy resources has become an imminent global objective in this era. This paper investigates the economic, social, and environmental aspects of constructing and operating the wind farm through a comprehensive social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) to assess the project's feasibility for the local Taiwanese population. The monetary values obtained were analyzed using net present value (NPV) methodology, evaluated from both publicly funded and privately owned perspectives. Key findings reveal significant differences between the two options when social and environmental factors are incorporated. Specifically, the NPV results for the publicly funded fixed-rate version are approximately 55.48 billion NTD, while the privately owned version stands at 4.18 billion NTD. Both versions are identified as profitable and feasible projects, provided the annual discount rate remains below 10.5% and 3.2%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis highlights that NPV results are particularly susceptible to fluctuations in capital costs and electricity sales income, with a 25% decrease in the feed-in tariff rate leading to a 43% drop in NPV. This finding suggests the need for a more thorough examination of these critical elements. This study is among the first to apply a comprehensive SCBA framework to an Asian offshore wind farm project, Formosa 2, incorporating not only economic but also environmental and social dimensions. By quantifying these factors, we provide novel insights into the comparative viability of publicly funded versus privately owned models, offering a holistic evidence base to guide renewable energy policy and investment in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishaq, Haris & Siddiqui, Osamah & Tseng, ChengJi, 2026. "Replacing conventional energy resources with wind: An integrated economic, environmental, and social assessment," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725002000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725002000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grecu, Eugenia & Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela & Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu, 2018. "The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 691-700.
    2. Hsu, Chiung-Wen & Ho, Shu-Ping, 2016. "Assessing feed-in tariffs on wind power installation and industry development in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 548-557.
    3. Zafirakis, D. & Chalvatzis, K. & Kaldellis, J.K., 2013. "“Socially just” support mechanisms for the promotion of renewable energy sources in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 478-493.
    4. Osvaldo Rodriguez-Hernandez & Manuel Martinez & Carlos Lopez-Villalobos & Hector Garcia & Rafael Campos-Amezcua, 2019. "Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of Small Wind Turbines in the Valley of Mexico Metropolitan Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Vickerman, R., 2000. "Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 7-16, January.
    7. Thoma, Mark, 2004. "Electrical energy usage over the business cycle," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 463-485, May.
    8. Ur Rehman, Obaid & Ali, Yousaf, 2021. "Optimality study of China’s crude oil imports through China Pakistan economic corridor using fuzzy TOPSIS and Cost-Benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Wehrle, Sebastian & Regner, Peter & Morawetz, Ulrich B. & Schmidt, Johannes, 2024. "Inferring local social cost from renewable zoning decisions. Evidence from Lower Austria’s wind power zoning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Kotb, Kotb M. & Abido, Mohamed A. & Hasanien, Hany M. & Atiya, Eman G. & Almakhles, Dhafer & Elmorshedy, Mahmoud F., 2024. "Techno-enviro-socio-economic design and finite set model predictive current control of a grid-connected large-scale hybrid solar/wind energy system: A case study of Sokhna Industrial Zone, Egypt," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    11. Mouter, Niek & Koster, Paul & Dekker, Thijs, 2021. "Contrasting the recommendations of participatory value evaluation and cost-benefit analysis in the context of urban mobility investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 54-73.
    12. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Iniyan, S. & Sreevalsan, E. & Rajapandian, S., 2007. "A review of wind energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1117-1145, August.
    13. Bagheri Nia, Mohammadsaeid & Edalat, Pedram, 2025. "Strategic decision-making in offshore oil and gas platform-to-wind turbine conversion: An integrated analysis of structural integrity into retrofit lifecycle costs and climate change impacts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    14. Wiser, Ryan & Millstein, Dev, 2020. "Evaluating the economic return to public wind energy research and development in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Yousaf Ali & Muhammad Sabir & Muhammad Bilal & Mehnab Ali & Arshad Ali Khan, 2020. "Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(2), pages 158-175, April.
    16. Mostafaeipour, A. & Sedaghat, A. & Dehghan-Niri, A.A. & Kalantar, V., 2011. "Wind energy feasibility study for city of Shahrbabak in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2545-2556, August.
    17. Nian, Victor & Liu, Yang & Zhong, Sheng, 2019. "Life cycle cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy under the climatic conditions in Southeast Asia – Setting the bottom-line for deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1003-1014.
    18. Kim, Hyo-Jin & Kim, Ju-Hee & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2019. "Social acceptance of offshore wind energy development in South Korea: Results from a choice experiment survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Sidhu, Arjan S. & Pollitt, Michael G. & Anaya, Karim L., 2018. "A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 881-894.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khanjarpanah, Hossein & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2019. "Sustainable wind plant location optimization using fuzzy cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1004-1018.
    2. Olsson, Jerry, 2009. "Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects: evidence from rural Philippines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 476-483.
    3. Mehdi Abid & Rafaa Mraihi, 2015. "Energy Consumption and Industrial Production: Evidence from Tunisia at Both Aggregated and Disaggregated Levels," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 1123-1137, December.
    4. Ewing, Bradley T. & Sari, Ramazan & Soytas, Ugur, 2007. "Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial output in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1274-1281, February.
    5. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    6. Pukazhselvan, D. & Sandhya, K.S. & Fagg, Duncan Paul & Blaabjerg, Frede, 2026. "The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).
    7. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    8. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    9. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Morovat, Navid & Athienitis, Andreas K. & Candanedo, José Agustín & Nouanegue, Hervé Frank, 2024. "Heuristic model predictive control implementation to activate energy flexibility in a fully electric school building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    11. Bottu, Caroline & Lambin, Eric F., 2026. "Mismatch between where solar projects are proposed and approved: the case of PV acceptance in the French Alps," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Chauhan, Pratham & Ja'fari, Mohammad & Jaworski, Artur J., 2026. "A numerical study of horizonal axis wind turbine blade Contamination: Aerodynamic and sustainable impacts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(PB).
    13. Abajian, Alexander & Pretnar, Nick, 2021. "An Aggregate Perspective on the Geo-spatial Distribution of Residential Solar Panels," MPRA Paper 105481, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Zhang, Yun-Long & Liu, Lan-Cui & Kang, Jia-Ning & Peng, Song & Mi, Zhifu & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2024. "Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    15. Haiyang Shang & Fang Su & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer, 2021. "Identifying the Strategic Priorities of the Technical Factors for the Sustainable Low Carbon Industry Based on Macroeconomic Conditions," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    16. Monge, Manuel & Claudio-Quiroga, Gloria & Poza, Carlos, 2024. "Chinese economic behavior in times of covid-19. A new leading economic indicator based on Google trends," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Leijon, Mats & Skoglund, Annika & Waters, Rafael & Rehn, Alf & Lindahl, Marcus, 2010. "On the physics of power, energy and economics of renewable electric energy sources – Part I," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1729-1734.
    18. Chang, Yue & Jia, Yulong & Hong, Tan, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis and multi-objective optimization of an innovative power generation system using biomass gasification and LNG regasification processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Laura Canale & Anna Rita Di Fazio & Mario Russo & Andrea Frattolillo & Marco Dell’Isola, 2021. "An Overview on Functional Integration of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Multi-Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    20. Moura Carneiro, F.O. & Barbosa Rocha, H.H. & Costa Rocha, P.A., 2013. "Investigation of possible societal risk associated with wind power generation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 30-36.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725002000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.