IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v98y2026ics0957178725001973.html

Building stakeholder trust in regulatory governance: Evidence from Ghana's public utilities regulatory commission

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz, Tia Abdulai Robert
  • Bigodza, Emmanuel Kems
  • Ahenkan, Albert
  • Mensah, James Kwame

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of stakeholder trust in the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) of Ghana by investigating the influence of five (5) governance constructs (independence, transparency, effectiveness, regulatory responsiveness, and accountability). Drawing on the stakeholder theory and literature on regulatory governance, the study employed cross-sectional data using a sample of 280 stakeholders from various sectors. The findings provide strong empirical support for the hypothesized relationships between stakeholder trust and four of the constructs: independence, transparency, regulatory responsiveness, and effectiveness. However, accountability did not emerge as a statistically significant predictor. Perceived independence and effectiveness consistently demonstrate a statistically significant positive association with stakeholder trust, highlighting the centrality of institutional autonomy and performance in shaping confidence in regulatory institutions. Transparency and responsiveness are also relevant, albeit with relatively smaller effect sizes, indicating that while openness and attentiveness enhance stakeholder confidence, they do not outweigh the foundational importance of independence and institutional effectiveness. Taken together, these results advance both theoretical understanding and practical implications of how regulatory bodies in developing country contexts build and sustain trust among diverse stakeholders. Theoretically, the study contributes to scholarship on governance and stakeholder trust by reinforcing the salience of independence and effectiveness as essential qualities of regulatory legitimacy in developing countries. Practically, these findings carry important implications for regulatory policy and practice in Ghana and similar developing country contexts. PURC must strengthen its institutional independence from political interference and improve the perceived effectiveness of its regulatory mandate to improve stakeholder trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz, Tia Abdulai Robert & Bigodza, Emmanuel Kems & Ahenkan, Albert & Mensah, James Kwame, 2026. "Building stakeholder trust in regulatory governance: Evidence from Ghana's public utilities regulatory commission," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:98:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725001973
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001973
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Stubbs & Colin Higgins, 2018. "Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 489-508, February.
    2. Koen Verhoest & Dominika Latusek & Frédérique Six & Libby Maman & Yannis Papadopoulos & Rahel M. Schomaker & Jarle Trondal, 2024. "Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 127-156, July.
    3. Michael Eduful, 2024. "Toward good governance in water resources management in Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 485-507, May.
    4. Michael A. Opam & John K. Turkson, 2000. "Power Sector Restructuring in Ghana: Reforms to Promote Competition and Private Sector Participation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: John K. Turkson (ed.), Power Sector Reform in SubSaharan Africa, chapter 4, pages 50-82, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Sung-Bum Kim & Dae-Young Kim, 2016. "The impacts of corporate social responsibility, service quality, and transparency on relationship quality and customer loyalty in the hotel industry," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 39-55, December.
    6. Corinna Dögl & Michael Behnam, 2015. "Environmentally Sustainable Development through Stakeholder Engagement in Developed and Emerging Countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 583-600, September.
    7. Michelle Greenwood & Harry Buren III, 2010. "Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 425-438, September.
    8. John Selsky & Barbara Parker, 2010. "Platforms for Cross-Sector Social Partnerships: Prospective Sensemaking Devices for Social Benefit," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 21-37, July.
    9. HakJun Song & Wenjia Ruan & Yunmi Park, 2019. "Effects of Service Quality, Corporate Image, and Customer Trust on the Corporate Reputation of Airlines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Monica Brezzi & Santiago González & David Nguyen & Mariana Prats, 2021. "An updated OECD framework on drivers of trust in public institutions to meet current and future challenges," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 48, OECD Publishing.
    11. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    12. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Amir Rashid & Ghulam Hussain & Hafiz Yasir Ali, 2020. "The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1395-1409, May.
    13. Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2020. "The Trust Triangle: Laws, Reputation, and Culture in Empirical Finance Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 217-238, May.
    14. Jacoby, Gady & Liu, Mingzhi & Wang, Yefeng & Wu, Zhenyu & Zhang, Ying, 2019. "Corporate governance, external control, and environmental information transparency: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 269-283.
    15. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu Wang & Ying-Kai Liao & Wann-Yih Wu & Khanh Bao Ho Le, 2021. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions in Brand Equity, Brand Credibility, Brand Reputation, and Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Kougiannou, Nadia K. & O'Meara Wallis, Matthew, 2020. "‘Chimneys don't belch out carnations!’ The (in)tolerance of corporate hypocrisy: A case study of trust and community engagement strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 348-362.
    3. Edwin Rühli & Sybille Sachs & Ruth Schmitt & Thomas Schneider, 2017. "Innovation in Multistakeholder Settings: The Case of a Wicked Issue in Health Care," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 289-305, June.
    4. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.
    5. Chiara Civera & Sara Moggi & Valentina Chiaudano & Edward R. Freeman, 2025. "Stakeholder Relationships in the Circular Economy. Conceptualizing Relational Approaches Through Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10698-10722, December.
    6. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Jens Hagendorff & Sonya Lim & Duc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Lender Trust and Bank Loan Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1758-1779, March.
    9. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.
    10. Jaime-Andres Correa-Garcia & Maria-Antonia Garcia-Benau & Emma Garcia-Meca, 2018. "CSR Communication Strategies of Colombian Business Groups: An Analysis of Corporate Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Svana Helen Björnsdóttir & Pall Jensson & Saemundur E. Thorsteinsson & Ioannis M. Dokas & Helgi Thor Ingason, 2023. "Aligning Stakeholders and Actors: A New Safety and Security-Based Design Approach for Major National Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-41, December.
    12. Ani V. Ter-Mkrtchyan & Aimee L. Franklin, 2023. "Stakeholder Analysis in the Context of Natural Disaster Mitigation: The Case of Flooding in Three U.S. Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Ali Uyar & Habiba Al-Shaer & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2026. "Board characteristics and aggressive CSR engagement: Do CSR committees provoke or restrain?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 269-311, January.
    14. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    15. H. Latan & C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & M. Ali, 2023. "Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars," Post-Print hal-04276024, HAL.
    16. Marli Gonan Božac & Katarina Kostelić & Morena Paulišić & Charles G. Smith, 2021. "Business Ethics Decision-Making: Examining Partial Reflective Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Boungou, Whelsy & Dufau, Bastien, 2025. "Shareholder wealth effects of corporate sustainability reporting regulations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Björn Mestdagh & Olivier Sempiga & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2023. "The Impact of External Shocks on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Linking the COVID-19 Pandemic to SDG Implementation at the Local Government Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    20. Babita Bhatt & Israr Qureshi & Suhaib Riaz, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 605-630, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:98:y:2026:i:c:s0957178725001973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.