IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v96y2025ics0957178725001146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium model of the impact of renewable portfolio standards and tradable green certificates on China's power supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Huan
  • Chen, Sien
  • Jiang, Jianli

Abstract

The global shift toward renewable energy has gained momentum as nations strive to address environmental challenges and ensure energy security, with policies such as the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) and Tradable Green Certificates (TGCs) playing pivotal roles. This study develops a power supply chain network (PSCN) equilibrium model that incorporates variations in renewable energy targets to examine the complex dynamics of how PSCNs are influenced by RPS and TGC policies. The findings reveal that although increasing installed capacity supports greater renewable power consumption within the power mix, the efficiency of this growth is limited, and relying solely on capacity expansion is not a cost-effective strategy. We show that well-calibrated RPSs can effectively boost power generation from renewable energy resources (REPs) and enhance environmental benefits within PSCNs. However, higher RPS targets may reduce the overall profitability of PSCNs, though they contribute positively to environmental improvements. Notably, the social benefits of the supply chain follow a U-shaped pattern as RPS targets, suggesting that determining an optimal target is crucial for maximizing social welfare. Our study highlights the importance of integrating TGC transactions into China's power market under RPSs and the need for proactive policy design to optimize social outcomes and promote REP growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Huan & Chen, Sien & Jiang, Jianli, 2025. "Equilibrium model of the impact of renewable portfolio standards and tradable green certificates on China's power supply chain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001146
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001146
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.