Author
Listed:
- Rego, Nuno
- Castro, Rui
- Lagarto, João
Abstract
The transition to a decentralized and decarbonized energy system has accelerated the adoption of renewable energy communities (REC), where prosumers share energy locally to enhance self-sufficiency and reduce electricity costs. Conventional models used in REC studies generally assume monetary energy transactions, where those with deficit generation financially compensate members with surplus energy. This study addresses a gap in the literature by proposing a novel energy management model for a Portuguese REC, optimizing socially conscious energy trading without internal monetary compensation. A community of 10 households with photovoltaic generation, with and without battery storage, and a tertiary building (TB) is analyzed over a 25-year investment horizon, incorporating realistic electricity prices, taxes, and the evolution of consumption and generation. The study evaluates three key aspects of REC: technical performance, economic viability, and environmental impact. Results show that prosumers can achieve € 2523 annually from selling surplus electricity to the TB rather than to the grid. A self-sufficiency of 80 % and a reduction in CO2 emissions can be achieved in the REC scenario with the highest battery capacity. Findings reveal that investing in a REC is more profitable than individual self-consumption or non-investment, with potential net present values reaching €14,806 and internal rates of return of 24 %. A fairness index calculation shows that the new benefit allocation model outperforms existing ones in ensuring equity among members. This simulation study provides valuable insights for prosumers and policymakers, demonstrating the economic and environmental advantages of REC in accelerating the clean energy transition.
Suggested Citation
Rego, Nuno & Castro, Rui & Lagarto, João, 2025.
"Sustainable energy trading and fair benefit allocation in renewable energy communities: A simulation model for Portugal,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101986
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.