Author
Abstract
Utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) development has expanded rapidly across compact and densely settled regions, raising questions about how solar installations are spatially organized. Despite accelerated growth in utility-scale PV in Rhode Island during the mid-2010s, no statewide spatial statistical assessment of solar siting patterns has previously been conducted. This study addresses that gap by providing the first comprehensive and reproducible spatial point-pattern analysis of utility-scale PV installations in Rhode Island. Using a verified dataset of 119 ground-mounted utility-scale PV sites, we apply a multi-method spatial statistical framework including centrality measures, nearest-neighbor distances, Ripley’s K and L(r) functions, Getis-Ord Gi∗ hotspot analysis and kernel density estimation. Results consistently reject spatial randomness and reveal statistically significant clustering across multiple spatial scales. Solar development in Rhode Island is directionally structured with a dominant north–south orientation and slight southwest–northeast tilt. Results show persistent hotspot regions across multiple neighborhood levels and bandwidth specifications. Density surfaces further indicate uneven spatial concentration rather than dispersed deployment. This descriptive study does not identify the causal drivers of siting decisions. Instead, it establishes a spatial statistical baseline that clarifies where clustering occurs and at what spatial scales, providing the baseline for future study on regulation, infrastructure planning, and renewable energy siting policy.
Suggested Citation
Battle, Christopher, 2026.
"The spatial clustering of utility-scale solar in Rhode Island,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:101:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000901
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102231
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:101:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.