Author
Listed:
- Soderman, Crystal
- Kim, Serena Y.
- Yip, Jen
- Shirgaokar, Manish
Abstract
Growth in electric vehicle (EV) adoption has increased interest in using EV batteries as grid resources. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technologies enable bidirectional power flows between electric vehicles and the electricity system and have demonstrated potential to support grid reliability and resilience in pilot programs worldwide. Despite demonstrated technical feasibility and system-level benefits for utility resource planning, broader V2G deployment remains limited. This study examines barriers to V2G adoption in the United States using qualitative evidence from 33 interviews with 42 stakeholders, including utilities, government agencies, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), school districts, and participants in V2G pilot programs. We apply the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) as an organizing framework to examine adoption barriers across five constructs: facilitating conditions, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, price value, and social influence. Barriers related to facilitating conditions and effort expectancy emerge as the most salient, reflecting persistent challenges in standardization and interoperability across the V2G ecosystem, as well as concerns related to market development, infrastructure readiness, grid integration, and compatibility between vehicles and charging equipment. Performance expectancy follows, as stakeholders raise concerns about battery degradation, vehicle warranty implications, and vehicle availability in day-to-day operations. This study contributes to understanding barriers to V2G adoption and identifies policy-relevant pathways to reduce implementation challenges, including the development of interoperable standards and clearer institutional support.
Suggested Citation
Soderman, Crystal & Kim, Serena Y. & Yip, Jen & Shirgaokar, Manish, 2026.
"Electric vehicles as grid resources: Barriers to vehicle-to-grid (V2G) in the United States,"
Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:juipol:v:101:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000342
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102175
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:101:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.