IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v100y2026ics0957178726000329.html

Bottled water or filtered tap water? A nexus-based sustainability assessment for Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • Shannak, Sa'd
  • Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra
  • Al Gaashani, Rashad
  • Al-Ansari, Tareq

Abstract

In Qatar, despite the presence of advanced water desalination infrastructure, heavy reliance on bottled water persists. This dependence contributes significantly to high energy consumption and plastic waste generation. A critical knowledge gap remains in evaluating the techno-economic and behavioral trade-offs between centralized bottled water systems and household-level filtration alternatives. The overarching objective of this study is to provide an evidence-based answer to whether drinking tap water treated with household filtration systems constitutes a more economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable option than reliance on bottled drinking water in Qatar. This study assesses a novel biomass-based, magnetic nanoparticle enhanced activated carbon (AC) filter developed at the Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute (QEERI), part of Hamad Bin Khalifa University. The performance of this system is compared with conventional bottled water sources representing three dominant drinking water pathways: reclaimed groundwater, desalinated seawater, and treated sewage effluent. A multidimensional assessment framework is employed, integrating carbon auditing, Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) through the estimation of the Levelized Cost of Water (LCOW), and flow-based game theory modeling to capture government policy influences and strategic interactions between policymakers and consumers. The results indicate that bottled desalinated water for human consumption imposes the highest economic burden, with LCOW values ranging from USD 0.15 to USD 0.22 per liter. In contrast, the innovative QEERI household filter achieves an LCOW at least two orders of magnitude lower, ranging from USD 0.00081 to USD 0.00102 per liter, while simultaneously reducing energy intensity. From a policy perspective, the game-theoretic analysis highlights the importance of targeted interventions, such as plastic levies or consumption subsidies to shift the Nash equilibrium toward more sustainable water consumption behaviors. The findings provide a practical blueprint for water-scarce regions to transition away from plastic-intensive bottled water systems toward low-cost, energy-efficient household filtration technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannak, Sa'd & Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra & Al Gaashani, Rashad & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2026. "Bottled water or filtered tap water? A nexus-based sustainability assessment for Qatar," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:100:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178726000329
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2026.102173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:100:y:2026:i:c:s0957178726000329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.