IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v67y2020ics0301420719308578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting sustainability in a low density territory through geoheritage: Casa da Pedra case-study (Araripe Geopark, NE Brazil)

Author

Listed:
  • Henriques, M.H.
  • Castro, A.R.S.F.
  • Félix, Y.R.
  • Carvalho, I.S.

Abstract

After being exploited from the Earth’s crust, raw materials and geodiversity elements of economic value are traditionally used for the benefit of society. However, geodiversity elements may provide other types of benefits to society, namely scientific, cultural, educational, and tourist services, as they currently happen in geoparks. Geoparks can be seen as a culturally differentiated way of transferring scientific insights into social practice and vice versa, as well as an effective path of achieving global sustainability. This work aims at contributing and analyzing the role played by geoparks to improve the living conditions of local populations. The research is qualitative in nature, a study case type, which describes and assesses a pioneering experience developed at the Casa da Pedra (“Stone House”) Reference Center. Built in 2014, Casa da Pedra is located in Inhumas, the municipality of Santana do Cariri which integrates the UNESCO Araripe Global Geopark (State of Ceará; NE Brazil). The activities performed at this center aim to bridge academic knowledge and responsibility to a low density region subject to arid climate conditions. By fulfilling the social needs of a low-income community, the project results provide positive social impacts in the Inhumas community, and can inspire similar initiatives in other geoparks and/or other low density territories displaying relevant geological heritage. Moreover, by integrating natural, social and humanistic scientific awareness with non-scientific and non-Western forms of knowledge, these also serve as a catalyst tool to achieve global sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Henriques, M.H. & Castro, A.R.S.F. & Félix, Y.R. & Carvalho, I.S., 2020. "Promoting sustainability in a low density territory through geoheritage: Casa da Pedra case-study (Araripe Geopark, NE Brazil)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:67:y:2020:i:c:s0301420719308578
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420719308578
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Oliveira Tavares & Maria Helena Henriques & Artur Domingos & Abel Bala, 2015. "Community Involvement in Geoconservation: A Conceptual Approach Based on the Geoheritage of South Angola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, April.
    2. de Almeida Ramos, George Manuel & Fernandes, João Luís Jesus, 2015. "Tourism territories in low density areas: The case of Naturtejo geopark in Portugal," MPRA Paper 77448, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 22 Mar 2016.
    3. Ruban, Dmitry A., 2017. "Geodiversity as a precious national resource: A note on the role of geoparks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 103-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuhui Li & Maocheng Li & Zhiqiang Ding, 2022. "Study on methodology of assessing synergy between conservation and development of karst protected area in the case of the Diehong Bridge Scenic Area of Jiuxiang Gorge Cave Geopark, Yunnan, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5867-5886, April.
    2. Shan Yang & Shengyuan Zhuo & Zitong Xu & Jianhong Chen, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Mining Heritage Reuse in Public–Private-Partnership Mode Based on Improved Matter–Element Extension Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Bethy Merchán-Sanmartín & Allen Cárdenas-Cruz & Maria Jaya-Montalvo & Josep Mata-Perelló & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2022. "Sites of Geological Interest Assessment for Geoeducation Strategies, ESPOL University Campus, Guayaquil, Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Jorge Manuel Prieto-Ballester & Vanessa Miguel-Barrado, 2022. "Perceived Rural Development in UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Sallam, Emad S. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Ermolaev, Vladimir A., 2022. "Geoheritage resources and new direction of infrastructural growth in Egypt: From geosite assessment to policy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habibi, Tahereh & Ponedelnik, Alena A. & Yashalova, Natalia N. & Ruban, Dmitry A., 2018. "Urban geoheritage complexity: Evidence of a unique natural resource from Shiraz city in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 85-94.
    2. Magadán-Díaz, Marta & Sotiriadis, Marios & Rivas-García, Jesús, 2019. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the Spanish hospitality industry," MPRA Paper 94090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Yuri A. Fedorov & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2019. "Geoheritage Resource of Small Mud Lakes in the Semi-Arid Environments of the Russian South," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos, 2016. "Destination branding and visitor brand loyalty: Evidence from mature tourism destinations in Greece," MPRA Paper 93897, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Tatyana K. Molchanova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2019. "New Evidence of the Bangestan Geoheritage Resource in Iran: Beyond Hydrocarbon Reserves," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Ifigenia Psarra & Özlem Altınkaya Genel & Alex van Spyk, 2021. "A Research by Design Strategy for Climate Adaptation Solutions: Implementation in the Low-Density, High Flood Risk Context of the Lake District, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Magner Turner-Carrión & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Gianella Bravo-Murillo & Maribel Aguilar-Aguilar & Nataly Paz-Salas & Edgar Berrezueta, 2022. "Geotouristic Route Proposal for Touristic Development in a Mining Area—Case Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Ruban, Dmitry A. & Mikhailenko, Anna V. & Yashalova, Natalia N., 2022. "Valuable geoheritage resources: Potential versus exploitation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Canan Cengiz & Şükran Şahin & Bülent Cengiz & Mükerrem Bahar Başkır & Pelin Keçecioğlu Dağlı, 2021. "Evaluation of the Visitor Understanding of Coastal Geotourism and Geoheritage Potential Based on Sustainable Regional Development in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Abd El-Aal, Ahmed & Abdullah, Gamil M.S. & Al- Metwaly, Wael M. & AbdelMaksoud, Kholoud M., 2023. "Geological and archeological heritage resources assessment of the Najran Province; towards the 2030 vision of Saudi Arabia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    13. Dmitry A. Ruban, 2018. "Karst as Important Resource for Geopark-Based Tourism: Current State and Biases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, December.
    14. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Paúl Carrión-Mero & Niurka Alvarado & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Alfonso Maldonado & Pablo Caldevilla & Josué Briones-Bitar & Edgar Berrezueta, 2020. "Geosites and Georesources to Foster Geotourism in Communities: Case Study of the Santa Elena Peninsula Geopark Project in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Hernandez-Maskivker, Gilda & Ferrari, Sonia & Cruyt, Aurélie Nathalie J., 2019. "Exploring community stakeholders’ perceptions of mass tourism: the case of Bruges," MPRA Paper 94223, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Marián Lukáč & Ľubomír Štrba & Alexander Černega & Samer Khouri, 2021. "Recent State Policy and Its Impact on Geopark Establishment and Operation in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Miguel Gurumendi-Noriega, 2021. "Worldwide Research on Geoparks through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos, 2016. "Destination branding and visitor loyalty: Evidence from mature tourism destinations in Greece," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 102-120.
    19. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Simeli, Ioanna, 2017. "Perception of service quality in agrotourism accommodations: Impact on guest loyalty and re-visit intentions," MPRA Paper 87914, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Sylwia Sygar & Wojciech Zgłobicki, 2022. "Geoheritage Resources in Polish Landscape Parks as a Basis for Developing a Network of Geoparks," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:67:y:2020:i:c:s0301420719308578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.