Author
Listed:
- Bhat, Shahid Ahmad
- Kumar, Amit
Abstract
Kavilal et al. (Resour. Policy 51 (2017) 204–218) pointed out the limitations of the fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (FPROMETHEE) method. To overcome the limitations, Kavilal et al. proposed an effective approach by integrating the FPROMETHEE, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy interpretive structural modeling (FISM). To illustrate this approach, Kavilal et al. considered a case example of a mining equipment manufacturer located in India. In future, the other researchers may use this approach for solving other real life problems and /or in their research work. It is pertinent to mention that to apply the approach, proposed by Kavilal et al., there is need to apply FAHP and to apply FAHP, there is need to check that the fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix is consistent or not. To check the same, Kavilal et al. have transformed the fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix into a crisp matrix and claimed that the fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix will be consistent if the transformed crisp matrix will be consistent. However, after a deep study, it is observed that on applying the defuzzification method, used by Kavilal et al. to transform the fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix into a crisp matrix, the obtained transformed crisp matrix will never be consistent therefore, one may conclude that the FAHP cannot be applied. Hence, one may conclude that the approach, proposed by Kavilal et al., cannot be applied. Keeping the same in mind, an appropriate defuzzification method is suggested to transform the fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix into a crisp pairwise comparison matrix.
Suggested Citation
Bhat, Shahid Ahmad & Kumar, Amit, 2018.
"An integrated fuzzy approach for prioritizing supply chain complexity drivers of an Indian mining equipment manufacturer by Kavilal, E. G., Venkatesan, S. P., Kumar, K. D. H., [Resour. Policy 51 (2017) 204–218]: Suggested modification,"
Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 278-280.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:57:y:2018:i:c:p:278-280
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.003
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:57:y:2018:i:c:p:278-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.