IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v39y2014icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A perspective on global harmonisation of major national mineral asset valuation codes

Author

Listed:
  • Njowa, G.
  • Clay, A.N.
  • Musingwini, C.

Abstract

Companies involved in the minerals industry have been exposed to operating in more than one geographical jurisdiction for over a century. This practice has been amplified in recent decades by globalisation of the world economy. Cross-jurisdictional exposure has required that the way information on mineral assets is reported in the public domain or as industry best practice be standardised in order to provide a common understanding, irrespective of regulatory jurisdiction. Accordingly, a global committee known as the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) was formed in 1994 to align national minerals reporting codes. CRIRSCO initially published a template in 2006 and updated it in May 2013 to align the national mineral reporting codes. The template fosters a common understanding by harmonising the definitions, classification, estimation processes and the public reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves. The standardisation of minerals reporting codes is a foundation from which inputs to subsequent valuations are defined. However, despite the various national valuation codes having adequate high-level commonality on some principles, valuation approaches, competence and application of these codes, there are differences that arise in the areas of definitions, some principles and scope that require alignment. Consequently, the International Mineral Valuation Committee (IMVAL) was formed in 2012 in Australia, primarily to develop a globally acceptable mineral asset valuation (MAV) template by harmonising the valuation codes. This paper contributes to the development of such a template by providing a plausible framework for its development. The framework is premised on a skeletal structure that initially encompasses only high-level commonality among the major valuation codes, while allowing jurisdiction-specific requirements to be addressed at the national level. There is flexibility for the template to evolve over time to include aspects not initially addressed, such as valuation of mineral corporations and their respective securities, and valuation of oil and gas assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Njowa, G. & Clay, A.N. & Musingwini, C., 2014. "A perspective on global harmonisation of major national mineral asset valuation codes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420713000858
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galos Krzysztof & Nieć Marek & Saługa Piotr W. & Uberman Robert, 2015. "The basic problems of mineral resources valuation methodologies within the framework of System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounts," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 31(4), pages 5-20, December.
    2. Fox, Kenneth A., 2017. "The usefulness of NI 43-101 technical reports for financial analysts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 225-233.
    3. Savolainen, Jyrki, 2016. "Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 49-65.
    4. Bebbington, Jan & Schneider, Thomas & Stevenson, Lorna & Fox, Alison, 2020. "Fossil fuel reserves and resources reporting and unburnable carbon: Investigating conflicting accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Marcello Ruberti & Stefania Massari, 2018. "Are the World-Leading Primary Silver Mines Exhausting?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.