IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v109y2025ics0301420725002673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory, myths and conspiracy theories: The legacy of mine decline for women in the Free State Goldfields, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Sesele, Kentse
  • Marais, Lochner

Abstract

In South Africa's mining past, women were excluded from commercial mining and forbidden to live with their migrant labourer partners at the mines. By the mid-1980s, change was in the air, and by the mid-1990s restrictions on the movement of miners and their families had ended. Miners still moved around from mine to mine, but now accompanied by women. Memory studies of mining history in South Africa have been largely about the men who worked in the mines and the powerful people and organisations who influenced their lives. In this paper we look instead at the women, to see how their experiences have shaped their memories of the past. As they told their stories, we heard about their struggles and regrets after three decades of swift decline in the Goldfields. We recorded a mélange of memories, myths and conspiracy theories. Our paper contributes to the literature on the social memories of vulnerable women in a resource community. We show how their memories of the wealth and safety of the past determine their thinking about the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Sesele, Kentse & Marais, Lochner, 2025. "Memory, myths and conspiracy theories: The legacy of mine decline for women in the Free State Goldfields, South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725002673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725002673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.