IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v109y2025ics0301420725002557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scrutinizing challenges to adopting digital technologies in the mining industry: A systematic review through PRISMA and bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pakdel, Javad
  • Erol, Ismail

Abstract

While the existing literature acknowledges the transformative potential of digitalization in the Mining Industry (MI), it remains highly fragmented and lacks a unified analytical synthesis. This systematic review aims to consolidate and evaluate existing knowledge by identifying the key challenges to digital transformation within the MI. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, studies were systematically retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus, using a search strategy refined through exclusion of irrelevant domains and restricted to peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2011 and 2024. A total of 41 studies met the eligibility criteria, based on inclusion of substantive discussion on digital implementation in the MI. Risk of bias was not formally assessed due to the scoping nature and methodological heterogeneity of the studies reviewed. In addition, bibliometric analysis was employed to examine publication trends, co-authorship patterns, and thematic keyword clusters. The findings reveal sixteen core challenges—ranging from high initial investment costs, legacy system constraints, and workforce resistance to regulatory ambiguities and infrastructural limitations in remote sites. Emerging technological concerns, particularly in cybersecurity and interoperability, also appear to impede large-scale digital commitment. Bibliometric insights further demonstrate the prevalence of automation- and sustainability-focused research, with recent scholarly momentum observed around blockchain-enabled traceability and AI-integrated monitoring. Although this synthesis provides insights, the evidence base is limited by uneven regional representation, conceptual dispersion, and the lack of comparative frameworks. No funding was received for this study, and it was not registered in a formal systematic review registry.

Suggested Citation

  • Pakdel, Javad & Erol, Ismail, 2025. "Scrutinizing challenges to adopting digital technologies in the mining industry: A systematic review through PRISMA and bibliometric analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725002557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725002557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.