IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v107y2025ics0301420725001412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lithium production in the United States: Socio-technical review of sites, environmental impacts, and social acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Brett, Alannah C.
  • Holley, Elizabeth A.
  • Deberdt, Raphael
  • Fahle, Lukas
  • Smith, Nicole M.

Abstract

The low-carbon transition has motivated a global exploration and development surge for lithium (Li). The United States has only one Li mine and commercial refinery, and one Li-byproduct producer in 2024. Projects from exploration to production are classified in four production types: hard-rock mining of Li pegmatites, soft-rock mining of Li clays and sediments, and solution mining of Li brines through evaporative concentration or direct lithium extraction (DLE). This contribution reviews all major U.S. lithium projects to total known (mid 2024) reserves of 0.71 Mt and resources of 27.8 Mt (million metric tonnes contained lithium). Upon this foundation, the political ecology of Li development is analyzed, focused on interconnected environmental impacts and social perceptions. Lithium pegmatite deposits (12 % of reserves; 2 % of resources) have seen open pit mining proposals raise concerns over water quality and landscape disruption. From Li clays and sediments (71 % of reserves; 74 % of resources) controversies have developed over Tribal cultural resources and potential impacts on desert playa ecosystems. Salar-type brines (10 % of reserves; 1 % of resources) supply the sole Li mine through evaporative concentration. High water usage in this method has led to research and development of DLE methods that may enable lithium recovery from geothermal brines and oilfield brines (11 % and 6 % of resources respectively). A summary conceptual diagram of the lithium landscape, highlights interconnected global, domestic, and site-specific factors necessary for responsible U.S. lithium production. This work illuminates how resource availability, technology, and social dynamics converge to shape the outcomes of lithium development and U.S. supply security.

Suggested Citation

  • Brett, Alannah C. & Holley, Elizabeth A. & Deberdt, Raphael & Fahle, Lukas & Smith, Nicole M., 2025. "Lithium production in the United States: Socio-technical review of sites, environmental impacts, and social acceptance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:107:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:107:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.