Author
Listed:
- Lèbre, Eléonore
- Czarnota, Karol
- Walsh, Stuart D.C.
- Haynes, Marcus
- Ufer, Natasha
- Sonter, Laura J.
- Sreekar, Rachakonda
- Bolz, Pascal
- Bulovic, Nevenka
- Côte, Claire
- Kunz, Nadja C.
- Micklethwaite, Steven
- Northey, Stephen A.
- Rochford, Louisa M.
- Schodde, Richard
- Seligmann, Benjamin
- Sturman, Kathryn
Abstract
The global energy transition will drive increased demand for a broad range of mined minerals. Australia is well positioned to support the global energy transition, given its mature mining sector and rich and diverse mineral resources. The potential growth in the mining sector represents an economic opportunity, however, navigating the associated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks remains a challenge. A step towards improved ESG credentials across the Australian mining sector is for mine developers, regulators, communities, investors and other industry stakeholders to be capable of integrating diverse types of ESG data into decision-making processes. This paper establishes the foundations for applying ESG mapping, a research technique that mobilises spatial data to analyse and compare extractive locations in terms of factors relevant to mining and exploration, at the scale of Australia. To do so, the paper first critically reviews 33 spatial ESG datasets available at national scale across six main themes: people, land uses, water resources, extreme events, nature conservation, and governance. The paper then provides two proof-of-concept applications of ESG mapping to the Australian mining context and draws on these preliminary applications to propose a program of research aiming to fully utilise this technique to inform decision makers.
Suggested Citation
Lèbre, Eléonore & Czarnota, Karol & Walsh, Stuart D.C. & Haynes, Marcus & Ufer, Natasha & Sonter, Laura J. & Sreekar, Rachakonda & Bolz, Pascal & Bulovic, Nevenka & Côte, Claire & Kunz, Nadja C. & Mic, 2025.
"ESG mapping of the Australian mining sector – The state of play on mobilising spatial datasets for decision making,"
Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:105:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001345
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105592
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:105:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.