Author
Listed:
- Biswal, Dinamani
- Bahinipati, Chandra Sekhar
Abstract
Several studies have enquired about the reason for the low adoption of crop insurance in India and noticed determinants associated with demographic, socio-economic, landholding, institutional characteristics, etc. However, limited studies consider nationally representative sample data for analysis, and further, there is a dearth of understanding in the intensification of crop insurance adoption. A few studies reveal that determinants are different for adopting crop insurance and the number of crops insured. Thus, this study aims to identify factors influencing crop insurance adoption and the number of crops insured in India. The National Sample Survey Office 70th and 77th rounds related to the Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural Households conducted in the 2012–13 and 2018–19 Kharif season (July - December) data are taken, and the double hurdle model is employed. Like other empirical studies in India, this study finds that socio-economic variables like caste, education, and economic status influence farmers’ behaviour towards crop insurance adoption. Large farmers are more likely to opt for crop insurance than other farmers. In particular, most variables related to access to various agricultural institutions are positive and significant for adoption but not for intensification of crop insurance. A separate analysis for landholding categories highlights the importance of these variables, particularly for marginal farmers. This needs special attention in the policy as it is imperative from the ongoing agricultural crisis in India to enhance adoption coverage so more farmers opt for crop insurance and purchase insurance for multiple crops. Such analysis is imperative as crop insurance is considered one of the most effective climate-smart agriculture practices.
Suggested Citation
Biswal, Dinamani & Bahinipati, Chandra Sekhar, 2026.
"Insuring crops against climate risks: A most effective agricultural practice in India,"
Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 308-326.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:308-326
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.06.021
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:308-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505735 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.