IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v102y2026i2p297-314.html

When product scarcity backfires (or doesn’t): Limited quantities affect perceived retailer sincerity in online promotions

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Yufang
  • Xie, Guang-Xin
  • Zhang, Jurui

Abstract

Limited quantity is prevalent in online promotions, where retailers set predetermined amounts of in-stock items to boost short-term sales through perceived scarcity. While prior studies suggest that demand-driven scarcity can elicit positive product evaluations, this research examines potential adverse effects of supply-driven scarcity on consumer perceptions of retailers, stemming from the granularity of limited quantities that deviate from consumer expectations. Four experiments and one field study demonstrate that less- (vs. more-) than-expected limited quantities undermine perceived retailer sincerity and, in turn, reduce purchase likelihood. This research contributes to the scarcity literature by revealing a novel scarce-insincere inference, an inferential leap beyond consumer product evaluations triggered by expectation disconfirmation. Two practical remedies are identified for retailers to mitigate these adverse effects: offering timely availability guarantees and employing external attribution framing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Yufang & Xie, Guang-Xin & Zhang, Jurui, 2026. "When product scarcity backfires (or doesn’t): Limited quantities affect perceived retailer sincerity in online promotions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 297-314.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:102:y:2026:i:2:p:297-314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2025.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925001022
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2025.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:102:y:2026:i:2:p:297-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.