IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v101y2025i3p366-381.html

Generating insult from injury: Receiving self improvement gifts causes negative word of mouth

Author

Listed:
  • Chapman, Linnéa M.
  • Reshadi, Farnoush

Abstract

Many retailers sell self improvement products – and some market these products as gifts. The present research reveals that doing so could have negative consequences. Five experiments investigated how recipients respond to self improvement gifts offering betterment in terms of physical appearance or communication skills. Results show that those who receive self improvement (vs. non improvement) gifts generate more negative word of mouth about the products they receive, for example, by giving them lower star ratings. This effect is explained by the hurt feelings that recipients of self improvement gifts experience. We identify two ways retailers can attenuate the negative word of mouth stemming from self improvement gifts. First, offering financial incentives when soliciting online reviews reduces gift recipients’ negativity. Second, using a humanized appeal when soliciting online reviews helps prevent negative product review ratings. The present findings have important implications for retailers that sell self improvement products. Specifically, retailers could use financial incentives and humanized review requests to attenuate negative word of mouth, or adjust elements of the marketing mix to nudge consumers away from selecting self improvement products as gifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Chapman, Linnéa M. & Reshadi, Farnoush, 2025. "Generating insult from injury: Receiving self improvement gifts causes negative word of mouth," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 366-381.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:3:p:366-381
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2025.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925000338
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2025.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Schrier Rifkin & Colleen P Kirk & Canan Corus & J Jeffrey Inman & Andrew T Stephen & Sarah G Moore, 2023. "A Turn of the Tables: Psychological Contracts and Word of Mouth about Sharing Economy Platforms When Consumers Get Reviewed," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 382-404.
    2. Jason Riis & Joseph P. Simmons & Geoffrey P. Goodwin, 2008. "Preferences for Enhancement Pharmaceuticals: The Reluctance to Enhance Fundamental Traits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 495-508, July.
    3. Wang, Yaming & Wang, Xingyuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan) & Ouyang, Qiang, 2024. "Effect of status threat on preference for cross-domain self-improvement products: The moderation of trade-off beliefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Sherry, John Jr. & McGrath, Mary Ann & Levy, Sidney J., 1993. "The dark side of the gift," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 225-244, November.
    5. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:382-404. is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Das, Gopal & Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J., 2018. "The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 203-216.
    7. Reshadi, Farnoush, 2023. "Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Costa, Ana & Guerreiro, João & Moro, Sérgio & Henriques, Roberto, 2019. "Unfolding the characteristics of incentivized online reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 272-281.
    9. Christian Hildebrand & Anouk Bergner, 2021. "Conversational robo advisors as surrogates of trust: onboarding experience, firm perception, and consumer financial decision making," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 659-676, July.
    10. Andrey Fradkin & David Holtz, 2023. "Do Incentives to Review Help the Market? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Airbnb," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 853-865, September.
    11. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Ravi Bapna & Vladas Griskevicius, 2018. "Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2065-2082, May.
    12. Reimer, Thomas & Benkenstein, Martin, 2016. "Altruistic eWOM marketing: More than an alternative to monetary incentives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 323-333.
    13. Thomas Allard & Katherine White, 2015. "Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 42(3), pages 401-419.
    14. Cindy Chung & Peter Darke, 2006. "The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word-of-mouth," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 269-279, December.
    15. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    16. Otnes, Cele & Lowrey, Tina M & Kim, Young Chan, 1993. "Gift Selection for Easy and Difficult Recipients: A Social Roles Interpretation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 229-244, September.
    17. Dimitrios Tsekouras & Dominik Gutt & Irina Heimbach, 2024. "The robo bias in conversational reviews: How the solicitation medium anthropomorphism affects product rating valence and review helpfulness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1651-1672, November.
    18. Sungha Jang & Ashutosh Prasad & Brian Ratchford, 2012. "How consumers use product reviews in the purchase decision process," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 825-838, September.
    19. Khare, Adwait & Labrecque, Lauren I. & Asare, Anthony K., 2011. "The Assimilative and Contrastive Effects of Word-of-Mouth Volume: An Experimental Examination of Online Consumer Ratings," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 111-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reshadi, Farnoush, 2023. "Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.
    3. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    4. Li, Peng & Park, Arim & Cho, Soohyun & Zhao, Yao, 2025. "Toward a more populous online platform: The economic impacts of compensated reviews," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Shi, Haijiao & Chen, Rong & Yin, Bingqing (Miranda), 2024. "Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 656-672.
    6. Ertimur, Burçak & Muñoz, Caroline & Hutton, James G., 2015. "Regifting: A multi-perspective processual overview," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1997-2004.
    7. Branco-Illodo, Ines & Heath, Teresa, 2020. "The ‘perfect gift’ and the ‘best gift ever’: An integrative framework for truly special gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 418-424.
    8. Wagner, Tillmann & Rudolph, Thomas, 2010. "Towards a hierarchical theory of shopping motivation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 415-429.
    9. Henrik Sällberg & Shujun Wang & Emil Numminen, 2023. "The combinatory role of online ratings and reviews in mobile app downloads: an empirical investigation of gaming and productivity apps from their initial app store launch," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 426-442, September.
    10. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. "‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 63-75, March.
    11. Dimitrios Tsekouras & Dominik Gutt & Irina Heimbach, 2024. "The robo bias in conversational reviews: How the solicitation medium anthropomorphism affects product rating valence and review helpfulness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1651-1672, November.
    12. Vanhamme, J. & de Bont, C.J.P.M., 2005. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases of Small Electric Appliances: A Pilot Study," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-081-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Carolina Rezende Pereira & Suzane Strehlau, 2016. "Social Bond Development Through Continuous Indebtedness," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 241-259, June.
    14. Kang, In-Hye & Kim, Hyoseok, 2025. "Are charitable gifts truly appreciated by the recipients who requested them? Impact of gift type and amount on recipients’ appreciation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Givi, Julian, 2021. "When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 393-405.
    16. Luo, Biao & Fang, Wenpei & Shen, Jie & Cong, Xue Fei, 2019. "Gift–image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-152.
    17. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    18. Guido, Gianluigi & Pino, Giovanni & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2016. "Assessing individuals' re-gifting motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5956-5963.
    19. de Hooge, Ilona E., 2014. "Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 380-394.
    20. Wu, Yinglu & Wu, Jianan, 2016. "The Impact of User Review Volume on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay: A Consumer Uncertainty Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 43-56.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:3:p:366-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.