IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v101y2025i2p241-262.html

Identity discounts

Author

Listed:
  • McCullough, Heath
  • Zablah, Alex Ricardo
  • Smith, Leah Warfield

Abstract

Price discounts present a dilemma for managers. Despite being an effective lever for increasing sales, discounts elicit negative quality perceptions and thus ultimately damage the brand. However, discounts based on the customer's identity, such as senior citizen, military, veteran, student, teacher, first responder, and healthcare worker discounts, are becoming increasingly prevalent. As such, this investigation introduces identity discounts – i.e., price discounts made available to consumers based exclusively on an element of their identity– and explores their novel effects on consumer product responses. Across five studies we find that identity discounts elicit an association between the product and the self, resulting in the creation of psychological ownership. Thus, because psychologically owned and self-associated objects are better liked and receive more favorable evaluations, we find that identity discounts mitigate the otherwise harmful effects of discounting on quality perceptions. However, the present research also reveals that the novel effects of identity discounts are dependent on identity congruence, such that psychological ownership and enhanced product evaluations only result when the promoted identity is deemed desirable (congruent) by consumers. For example, senior citizen discounts create psychological ownership and improve product evaluations when offered to older consumers who embrace the senior citizen identity but are as damaging as traditional discounts when offered to younger seniors who do not. Therefore, while our research suggests retailers should continue to include identity discounts in their promotional toolbox as they can confer benefits that traditional discounts do not, it also offers a cautionary warning: as consumer identities are heterogenous, so too are the effects of identity discounts.

Suggested Citation

  • McCullough, Heath & Zablah, Alex Ricardo & Smith, Leah Warfield, 2025. "Identity discounts," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 241-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:2:p:241-262
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2025.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925000144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2025.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCracken, Grant, 1986. "Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(1), pages 71-84, June.
    2. C. Miguel Brendl & Amitava Chattopadhyay & Brett W. Pelham & Mauricio Carvallo, 2005. "Name Letter Branding: Valence Transfers When Product Specific Needs Are Active," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 405-415, December.
    3. Claudia Townsend & Sanjay Sood, 2012. "Self-Affirmation through the Choice of Highly Aesthetic Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 415-428.
    4. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    5. Kirk, Colleen P. & McSherry, Bernard & Swain, Scott D., 2015. "Investing the self: The effect of nonconscious goals on investor psychological ownership and word-of-mouth intentions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 186-194.
    6. Scott, Carol A & Yalch, Richard F, 1980. "Consumer Response to Initial Product Trial: A Bayesian Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(1), pages 32-41, June.
    7. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    8. Inman, J Jeffrey & Peter, Anil C & Raghubir, Priya, 1997. "Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(1), pages 68-79, June.
    9. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard H, 1990. "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(6), pages 1325-1348, December.
    10. Dost, Florian & Wilken, Robert & Eisenbeiss, Maik & Skiera, Bernd, 2014. "On the Edge of Buying: A Targeting Approach for Indecisive Buyers Based on Willingness-to-Pay Ranges," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 393-407.
    11. Remi Trudel & Jennifer J. Argo & Matthew D. Meng, 2016. "The Recycled Self: Consumers’ Disposal Decisions of Identity-Linked Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 246-264.
    12. Sara Loughran Dommer & Vanitha Swaminathan, 2013. "Explaining the Endowment Effect through Ownership: The Role of Identity, Gender, and Self-Threat," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 1034-1050.
    13. Sirgy, M Joseph, 1982. "Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 287-300, December.
    14. Liad Weiss & Gita V. Johar, 2013. "Egocentric Categorization and Product Judgment: Seeing Your Traits in What You Own (and Their Opposite in What You Don't)," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 185-201.
    15. Buil, Isabel & de Chernatony, Leslie & Martínez, Eva, 2013. "Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-122.
    16. Christopher L. Newman & Melissa D. Cinelli & Douglas Vorhies & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2019. "Benefitting a few at the expense of many? Exclusive promotions and their impact on untargeted customers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 76-96, January.
    17. Solomon, Michael R, 1983. "The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(3), pages 319-329, December.
    18. Patrick M. A. Sleiman & Mei-Lun Wang & Antonella Cianferoni & Seema Aceves & Nirmala Gonsalves & Kari Nadeau & Albert J. Bredenoord & Glenn T. Furuta & Jonathan M. Spergel & Hakon Hakonarson, 2014. "GWAS identifies four novel eosinophilic esophagitis loci," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5, December.
    19. Didem Kurt & J. Jeffrey Inman, 2013. "Mispredicting Others' Valuations: Self-Other Difference in the Context of Endowment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 78-89.
    20. Scott A. Neslin & Caroline Henderson & John Quelch, 1985. "Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 147-165.
    21. Thaler, Richard, 1980. "Toward a positive theory of consumer choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 39-60, March.
    22. Tepper, Kelly, 1994. "The Role of Labeling Processes in Elderly Consumers' Responses to Age Segmentation Cues," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 503-519, March.
    23. Promothesh Chatterjee & Caglar Irmak & Randall L. Rose, 2013. "The Endowment Effect as Self-Enhancement in Response to Threat," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 460-476.
    24. LeBoeuf, Robyn A. & Shafir, Eldar & Bayuk, Julia Belyavsky, 2010. "The conflicting choices of alternating selves," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 48-61, January.
    25. Andrew W. Perkins & Mark R. Forehand, 2012. "Implicit Self-Referencing: The Effect of Nonvolitional Self-Association on Brand and Product Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 142-156.
    26. Dirk van der Linden & Stijn J.B.A. Hoppenbrouwers & Henderik A. Proper, 2014. "On the Identification of Modeler Communities," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 22-40, April.
    27. Joann Peck & Suzanne B. Shu, 2009. "The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 434-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    2. Charan K. Bagga & Neil Bendle & June Cotte, 2019. "Object valuation and non-ownership possession: how renting and borrowing impact willingness-to-pay," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 97-117, January.
    3. Thomas, Veronica L. & Yeh, Marie & Jewell, Robert D., 2015. "Enhancing valuation: the impact of self-congruence with a brand on the endowment effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 178-185.
    4. Kun Zhou & Jun Ye & Xiao-xiao Liu, 2023. "Is cash perceived as more valuable than digital money? The mediating effect of psychological ownership and psychological distance," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 55-68, March.
    5. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    6. Kamleitner, Bernadette & Dickert, Stephan, 2015. "The two faces of ownership: Introduction to the special section on ownership and economic decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 159-161.
    7. Alexopoulos, Theodore & Šimleša, Milija & Francis, Mélanie, 2015. "Good self, bad self: Initial success and failure moderate the endowment effect," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 32-40.
    8. Fennis, Bob M. & Wiebenga, Jacob H., 2017. "Me, myself, and Ikea: Qualifying generic self-referencing effects in brand judgment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 69-79.
    9. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    10. Gineikiene, Justina & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Auruskeviciene, Vilte, 2017. "“Ours” or “theirs”? Psychological ownership and domestic products preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 93-103.
    11. Martin P. Fritze & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Martin Benkenstein, 2019. "Digital transformation and possession attachment: examining the endowment effect for consumers’ relationships with hedonic and utilitarian digital service technologies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 311-337, June.
    12. Shah, Denish & Webster, Emily & Kour, Gurpreet, 2023. "Consuming for content? Understanding social media-centric consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    13. Ekinci, Yuksel & Sirakaya-Turk, Ercan & Preciado, Sandra, 2013. "Symbolic consumption of tourism destination brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 711-718.
    14. Colucci, Domenico & Franco, Chiara & Valori, Vincenzo, 2024. "The endowment effect with different possession times and types of items," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    15. Sophia Elizabeth Vlieger de Oliveira & Catalina Wache & Sascha Raithel, 2024. "The role of possessions for the extended self of sustainability- concerned anti-consumers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(3), pages 220-238, December.
    16. Nora Nägele & Benjamin Walter & Philipp Scharfenberger & Daniel Wentzel, 2020. "“Touching” services: tangible objects create an emotional connection to services even before their first use," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 741-766, July.
    17. Larsen, Gretchen & Lawson, Rob & Todd, Sarah, 2009. "The consumption of music as self-representation in social interaction," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 16-26.
    18. Kirk, Colleen P. & McSherry, Bernard & Swain, Scott D., 2015. "Investing the self: The effect of nonconscious goals on investor psychological ownership and word-of-mouth intentions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 186-194.
    19. Qin, Dan, 2024. "Differentiating roles of the reference alternative," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 196-221.
    20. Liu, Jingshi (Joyce) & Dalton, Amy Nicole, 2024. "The inauthentic consumer: Consequences of self-inauthenticity for possession disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:2:p:241-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.