Author
Listed:
- Lim, Hakyung
- Jin, Seungwook
Abstract
Retailers increasingly adopt Single Sign-On (SSO) to reduce onboarding effort and improve early conversion, yet little is known about how such frictionless entry shapes downstream retention and post-purchase behaviors. Using transaction-level data from 807,545 customers across 193 online apparel retailers, this study compares customers using SSO, password-based accounts, or guest access in their subsequent retention and post-purchase service behaviors. The results reveal a paradox of convenience. Contrary to what account-based access would predict, SSO users show roughly 16% lower repurchase odds than guest users who create no account, while password-based users show the opposite pattern with roughly 26% higher repurchase odds. SSO is thus associated with the lowest observed retention among the entry methods examined, and these associations become more pronounced over time. Both account-based entry methods are associated with higher rates of returns and exchanges, yet SSO users who engage in effortful post-purchase procedures show an attenuated loyalty deficit, a pattern consistent with the notion that retailer-hosted touchpoints may provide additional engagement opportunities for customers whose initial entry involved limited retailer-specific grounding. Furthermore, SSO users show little response to promotional incentives but react disproportionately negatively to unexpected costs such as shipping fees, suggesting that managing perceived costs may be a more effective retention lever than incentive provision for this segment. Overall, retailers adopting SSO should complement frictionless entry with light-touch engagement while managing perceived costs through transparent communication and proactive cost reduction.
Suggested Citation
Lim, Hakyung & Jin, Seungwook, 2026.
"Are frictionless experiences always beneficial? Customer loyalty consequences of Single Sign-On (SSO) onboarding,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000846
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104804
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.