IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v92y2026ics0969698926000822.html

AI-chatbots’ positive emotional expression may backfire: A perspective of emotional intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Hao
  • Li, Guoxin

Abstract

As emotional artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots become increasingly prevalent in customer service settings, understanding how their emotional expressions shape customer responses has become ever more important. Based on expectancy violations theory (EVT) and feelings-as-information theory (FIT), this study explores how positive emotional intensity (PEI) expressed by AI-chatbots influences customer satisfaction. Through three scenario-based experiments, this study reveals an inverted U-shaped relationship between AI-expressed PEI and customer satisfaction and demonstrates that this effect is mediated by perceived emotional expectancy violations. Moreover, customers’ own PEI significantly moderates this inverted U-shaped relationship. Specifically, when customers are in low PEI states, AI-expressed PEI exhibits an inverted U-shaped effect on their satisfaction. In contrast, when they are already in a moderate or high PEI state, AI-expressed PEI positively influences their satisfaction. These findings not only advance our understanding of human–AI emotional interaction, but also offer actionable insights for the effective deployment of emotional AI-chatbots in customer service settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Hao & Li, Guoxin, 2026. "AI-chatbots’ positive emotional expression may backfire: A perspective of emotional intensity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000822
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698926000822
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.