IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v91y2026ics0969698926000494.html

Beyond the code: How algorithmic creativity enhances tolerance to recommendation bias?

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Manzhi
  • Wang, Lijing

Abstract

While algorithms drive transformative changes in marketing practices, they concurrently generate recommendation biases that result in unequal consumer outcomes and adverse reactions. This research examines the issue of recommendation bias stemming from recommendation algorithms. Grounded in intentionality theory, the study elucidates the underlying mechanism through which algorithmic creativity (high vs. low) influences consumer responses. Across six studies (NÂ =Â 2686), the results demonstrate that under conditions of recommendation bias, consumers exhibit less negative responses toward high creativity algorithms than toward low creativity ones. This effect is serially mediated by intentionality inference and perceived unfairness. Furthermore, the impact of algorithmic creativity is amplified in the context of experience goods, whereas no significant difference emerges for search goods. These findings offer novel insights into consumer reactions to algorithmic decision-making and provide practical implications for firms seeking to refine their personalized recommendation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Manzhi & Wang, Lijing, 2026. "Beyond the code: How algorithmic creativity enhances tolerance to recommendation bias?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000494
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698926000494
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s0969698926000494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.