IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v90y2026ics0969698925004941.html

Does it matter who owns the AI device? Impact of device ownership on customer dissatisfaction in AI service failure

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Zhongpeng
  • Zhao, Liben
  • Su, Tong

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into the service industry. However, AI service failures remain inevitable. Limited attention has been paid to how device ownership influences customers' emotional responses to AI service failures. This study is grounded in attribution theory and social impact theory, examining the impact of device ownership (customer-owned vs. merchant-owned) on customer dissatisfaction in AI service failures, along with its underlying mechanism and boundary conditions. Across four scenario-based experiments, the results demonstrate that customers experience lower dissatisfaction when service failures occur on their own devices rather than merchant-owned ones. This effect is mediated by responsibility attribution, such that using one's own device induces a greater internal attribution of failure. Nevertheless, this attributional process is significantly weakened when the AI is highly anthropomorphized or the service environment is crowded. These findings extend the literature on AI service failure by identifying device ownership as a crucial determinant of customer dissatisfaction, offering practical implications for mitigating negative responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Zhongpeng & Zhao, Liben & Su, Tong, 2026. "Does it matter who owns the AI device? Impact of device ownership on customer dissatisfaction in AI service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004941
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925004941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.