Author
Listed:
- Dang-Van, Thac
- Doan, Linh T.M.
- Huynh, Quintessa
Abstract
Fake online reviews have become a threat to responsible retail consumption because they distort how consumers evaluate and switch from this brand to another. This study examines the psychological pathways through this process and compares such behaviour across China and Vietnam. Backed by the Stimulus-Organism-Response theory, the model treats consumer distrust, cognitive dissonance and negative affectivity as mediators that connect exposure to fake reviews with subsequent switching behaviour. Survey data from 329 Chinese and 234 Vietnamese online shoppers were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling with multi-group analysis. Results show that fake reviews directly and indirectly increase switching intentions. The direct effect is stronger among Vietnamese consumers, whereas the distrust and dissonance pathways are more pronounced among Chinese consumers. Negative affectivity is the most powerful mediator overall but does not differ by culture. These findings indicate that Chinese consumers tend to process fake reviews through stronger distrust and dissonance pathways, whereas Vietnamese consumers exhibit a more direct switching response. For cross-border e-commerce, retailers should emphasise trust restoration and expectation alignment in China and rapid transparency in Vietnam. The study contributes to the fake review literature by validating a multi-pathway cross-cultural model that integrates psychological and cultural mechanisms shaping consumer switching in e-tailing.
Suggested Citation
Dang-Van, Thac & Doan, Linh T.M. & Huynh, Quintessa, 2026.
"Psychological pathways from fake reviews to consumer switching in e-tailing: a cross-cultural analysis,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004795
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104700
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.