Author
Listed:
- Li, Ji
- Li, Yuanhui
- Wang, Xuan
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), virtual streamers have gained widespread adoption, as they are inexpensive and can mitigate public relations risks. However, they also face challenges such as a lack of emotional resonance and insufficient trust. Some existing research suggests that high anthropomorphism enhances trust and purchase intention, whereas other studies indicate it may trigger negative attitudes. This divergence is primarily due to the insufficient attention to transactional context—the price expectation discrepancy (PED). This study examines how anthropomorphism (high vs. low) and PED (price higher vs. lower than expected) influence consumer purchase intention. Three online experiments reveal a significant interaction effect between anthropomorphism of virtual streamers and PED on purchase intention. When prices are lower than expected, high anthropomorphism streamers enhance purchase intention more than virtual streamers with low anthropomorphism. When prices exceed expectations, high-anthropomorphism avatars reduce purchase intention more significantly than low-anthropomorphism ones. Inferred intentions mediate this effect: virtual streamers with high anthropomorphism evoke benevolent intent perceptions at low prices and selfish intent perceptions at high prices; virtual streamers with low anthropomorphism weaken such intent-based inferences. Moreover, AI literacy weakens this mediation pathway, indicating a moderated mediation process. This study provides the first systematic evidence that PED conditions the effects of anthropomorphism in livestream commerce, theoretically extending the concept of expectation discrepancy and social information processing to human–computer interactions and refining individual differences via AI literacy. Managerially, the findings guide the alignment of anthropomorphism with pricing strategies in the live streaming e-commerce industry.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.