Author
Listed:
- Bao, Qian
- Xie, Guanhong
- Yao, Yuan
Abstract
The emergence of the single economy, combined with advances in artificial intelligence (AI), has given rise to AI technologies centred on romantic companion robots (RCRs). These technologies are profoundly reshaping young users' perceptions and experiences of intimate relationships. Drawing on the stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) theoretical framework, this study employs a multi-method approach that integrates partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and necessary condition analysis (NCA) to develop and validate a composite pathway model of users' psychological dependence on RCRs. Using the ‘Xingye’ RCR application as a case study, 457 valid responses were collected to evaluate the effects of six key stimulus variables – perceived personalisation, anthropomorphism, interactivity, hedonic motivation, intimacy, and moral perception – on user trust and satisfaction. Moreover, this study examined the mediating roles of trust and satisfaction in shaping psychological dependence. Results from PLS-SEM supported all hypothesised relationships, confirming trust and satisfaction as critical mediators. ANN analysis further revealed significant nonlinear effects of intimacy, moral perception, and interactivity on trust and satisfaction. In addition, NCA identified intimacy and interactivity as necessary conditions for the formation of psychological dependence. Furthermore, immersion tendency significantly moderates the relationship between interactivity and trust, while demographic factors such as gender, age, and education level exert differential influences. Overall, these findings advance empirical understanding of human–robot intimacy in the era of digital affective technologies and provide theoretical foundations and practical implications for the personalised design, ethical regulation, and market deployment of RCR products.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s0969698925004448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.