Author
Listed:
- Mo, Linlin
- Sands, Sean
- Leckie, Civilai
Abstract
AI voice assistants have become central to consumer shopping experiences, particularly within the growing field of voice commerce. As these technologies evolve, they have increasingly assumed the role of surrogate shoppers, sometimes even replacing human intermediaries. Yet our understanding of how an AI voice assistant functions in this surrogate capacity remains limited. This study investigates the role of AI voice assistants as surrogate shoppers, using uses and gratifications theory to examine how two key attributes, namely value provision and time efficiency, shape consumer satisfaction and reuse intentions through perceived benefits. Purchase involvement is proposed as a critical boundary condition that influences how these attributes affect consumers’ perceptions. Using survey data from 395 US consumers with experience using AI voice assistants for shopping, the findings reveal that utilitarian benefits mediate the effects of value provision and time efficiency on satisfaction and reuse intentions, while social benefits mediate only the link between value provision and satisfaction. The impact of time efficiency on utilitarian benefits is stronger for high-involvement purchases, whereas the effect of value provision on utilitarian benefits is stronger for low-involvement purchases. This research extends the uses and gratifications theory, surrogate shopping theory, resource scarcity theory, and involvement theory by demonstrating their relevance to AI-enabled shopping contexts and offers practical guidance for designing more effective voice shopping interfaces and solutions.
Suggested Citation
Mo, Linlin & Sands, Sean & Leckie, Civilai, 2026.
"Outsourcing choice: AI voice assistants as shopping surrogates,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:89:y:2026:i:pb:s0969698925004369
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104657
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:89:y:2026:i:pb:s0969698925004369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.