IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v89y2026ipbs0969698925003947.html

Matching generative AI word-of-mouth with product type: Impact on consumer adoption and trust

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Jiaxin
  • Zhang, Depeng
  • Chen, Chunfeng
  • Du, Helen S.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence word-of-mouth (AI WOM), as a new way of information exchange, has become a marketing tool for many e-commerce companies. However, limited attention has been paid to its application scenarios and the adoption of different AI WOM forms in previous studies. This study investigated whether consumers are more likely to adopt AI WOM for utilitarian versus hedonic products when exposed to unidirectional versus interactive forms. It also analyses the psychological processes behind adoption through cognitive and affective dimensions. Four studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. Findings revealed that consumers are more likely to adopt unidirectional AI WOM for utilitarian products and interactive AI WOM for hedonic products. This matching effect is mediated by functional and human-like trust in AI WOM, respectively. Moreover, consumer privacy concerns moderate the matching effect. These findings clarify the conditions under which different types of AI WOM are effective for specific product types and provide theoretical support for companies in selecting appropriate AI WOM strategies based on product characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Jiaxin & Zhang, Depeng & Chen, Chunfeng & Du, Helen S., 2026. "Matching generative AI word-of-mouth with product type: Impact on consumer adoption and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:89:y:2026:i:pb:s0969698925003947
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925003947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:89:y:2026:i:pb:s0969698925003947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.