Author
Listed:
- Kim, Songmee
- Youn, Chorong
- Cho, Erin
- Kim, Sunwoo
Abstract
This study examines the impact of virtual influencers on consumer responses during service failures. Grounded in construal level theory, we investigate how two appearance characteristics, specifically human-likeness (human-like vs. avatar-like) and beauty type (typical vs. unique), affect social psychological distance and, consequently, coping behavioral intentions following virtual influencer service failures. We also explore the moderating roles of service failure severity and consumer attribution (internal vs. external) in the relationship between social psychological distance and their behavioral intentions. Data were collected from 304 U.S. women in their 20s and 30s. Results confirmed that human-like virtual influencers with typical beauty reduce social psychological distance, prompting greater reconciliation rather than avoidance or revenge after service failures. In contrast, avatar-like virtual influencers with unique beauty increase social psychological distance and foster more adverse behavioral intentions. Moreover, less severe service failures elicit milder consumer responses, including lower avoidance and higher reconciliation intentions, when SPD is lower; however, severe failures intensify adverse reactions, including higher avoidance and lower reconciliation intentions, when SPD is higher. Lastly, consumer attribution, whether they tend to blame internal or external cues, moderates the causal relationships between SPD and those three behavioral intentions as well. These findings suggest that marketers leveraging virtual influencers should develop tailored recovery strategies considering appearance cues of virtual influencers, social psychological distance, service failure severity, and consumers’ attribution tendencies. This research offers actionable guidance for brands featuring virtual influencers and deepens our understanding of digital-era service failures.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s096969892500205x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.