Author
Listed:
- Zhao, Yuexin
- Tang, Siyi
- Zhang, Hongyu
- Lyu, Long
Abstract
The rise of fake reviews generated by artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant challenges for online platforms, retailers, and consumers, as advanced generative models like ChatGPT produce fake reviews. More seriously, unlike human-generated fake reviews, which exhibit psychological cues, AI-generated fake reviews lack deceptive intent and instead reflect algorithmic patterns that are increasingly difficult to detect. This study investigates the linguistic distinctions among AI-generated fake reviews, human-generated fake reviews, and authentic reviews by integrating the theoretical model of textual differences and AI characteristics. Analyzing 714,016 reviews through text analysis, entropy weight method and hypothesis testing, this research finds that AI-generated fake reviews demonstrate higher comprehensibility, lower levels of specificity, exaggeration, and negligence compared to human-generated fakes and authentic reviews. These findings challenge the existing paradigms in fake review research. This means that in traditional detection, the situations where there are AI-generated fake reviews that do not conform to rules should be given further consideration. Additionally, AI-generated fake reviews exhibit significantly higher mechanicalness and lower empathy than authentic reviews, providing actionable linguistic cues for identification. These findings highlight the need for revised detection methods that account for AI characteristics. Theoretically, it innovatively combines the textual differences model with AI capabilities to investigate AI-generated fake reviews, enriching the fake review detection literature. Practically, it offers e-commerce platforms and consumers enhanced detection metrics to improve algorithmic accuracy in identifying AI-generated deception.
Suggested Citation
Zhao, Yuexin & Tang, Siyi & Zhang, Hongyu & Lyu, Long, 2025.
"AI vs. human: A large-scale analysis of AI-generated fake reviews, human-generated fake reviews and authentic reviews,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925001791
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104400
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925001791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.